Who is a better tutor? gaze hints with a human or humanoid tutor in game play

E.N. Mwangi, E.I. Barakova, M. Díaz, A.C. Mallofré, G.W.M. Rauterberg

    Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/CongresprocedureConferentiebijdrageAcademicpeer review

    10 Citaten (Scopus)
    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Samenvatting

    In this paper, we present a study that analyses the effects of robot or human gaze hints on people's choices in a card game. We asked human participants to play a matching card game in the presence of a human or a robotic tutor. Our aim was to find out if gaze hints provided by the tutor can direct the attention and influence the choices of the human participants. The results show that participants performed significantly better when they received gaze hints from a tutor than when they did not. Furthermore, we found that people identified the tutor hints more often in robot condition than in human condition and, as a result, performed significantly better.

    Originele taal-2Engels
    TitelHRI 2017 - Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 6-9 March 2017, Vienna, Austria
    Plaats van productieNew York
    UitgeverijAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
    Pagina's219-220
    Aantal pagina's2
    ISBN van elektronische versie978-1-4503-4885-0
    DOI's
    StatusGepubliceerd - 6 mrt. 2017
    Evenement12th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2017 - Aula der Wissenschaft, Vienna, Oostenrijk
    Duur: 6 mrt. 20179 mrt. 2017
    Congresnummer: 12
    http://humanrobotinteraction.org/2017/

    Congres

    Congres12th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2017
    Verkorte titelHRI 2017
    Land/RegioOostenrijk
    StadVienna
    Periode6/03/179/03/17
    Internet adres

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Who is a better tutor? gaze hints with a human or humanoid tutor in game play'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit