Voting, resilience, and inclusiveness in standardisation: a commentary on Bekkers & Lazaj’s and Stanojević’s implications for ETSI and beyond

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftCommentaar/Brief aan de redacteurAcademicpeer review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

The European Commission’s Standardisation Strategy identifies issues with ETSI’s inclusiveness. In this commentary, I reflect on how the research by Bekkers & Lazaj on voting in ETSI and Stanojević on the organisation’s resilience strategies contributes to this debate. Taken together, these contributions suggest that the issue may not be as severe as the European Commission suggests, but that ETSI’s organisational response to the challenge may not be very effective. I also argue that these insights are relevant beyond ETSI to the broader discourse on standardisation, as well as future research on goal-directed networks in general. Both studies raise important questions related to decision-making and organisational responses to crises in these contexts.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)1369-1374
Aantal pagina's6
TijdschriftInnovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
Volume37
Nummer van het tijdschrift5
Vroegere onlinedatum27 feb. 2024
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2024

Financiering

The author has received funding for a research project about the societal impact of standards from the national standard bodies of Austria (Austrian Standards International, ASI), Denmark (Danish Standards, DS), Finland (Finnish Standards Association, SFS), The Netherlands (Royal Netherlands Standardization Institute, NEN), Norway (Standards Norway, SN), and Sweden (Swedish Institute for Standards, SIS).

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Voting, resilience, and inclusiveness in standardisation: a commentary on Bekkers & Lazaj’s and Stanojević’s implications for ETSI and beyond'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit