Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: a survey on a Dutch university campus

Y. Wang, R. de Groot, F. Bakker, H.J. Wörtche, R. Leemans

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

19 Citaties (Scopus)

Uittreksel

To better understand the influence of urban green infrastructure (UGI) on outdoor human thermal comfort, a survey and physical measurements were performed at the campus of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in spring and summer 2015. Three hundred eighty-nine respondents were interviewed in five different green spaces. We aimed to analyze people’s thermal comfort perception and preference in outdoor urban green spaces, and to specify the combined effects between the thermal environmental and personal factors. The results imply that non-physical environmental and subjective factors (e.g., natural view, quiet environment, and emotional background) were more important in perceiving comfort than the actual thermal conditions. By applying a linear regression and probit analysis, the comfort temperature was found to be 22.2 °C and the preferred temperature was at a surprisingly high 35.7 °C. This can be explained by the observation that most respondents, who live in temperate regions, have a natural tendency to describe their preferred state as “warmer” even when feeling “warm” already. Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, the four significant factors influencing thermal comfort were people’s exposure time in green spaces, previous thermal environment and activity, and their thermal history. However, the effect of thermal history needs further investigation due to the unequal sample sizes of respondents from different climate regions. By providing evidence for the role of the objective and subjective factors on human thermal comfort, the relationship between UGI, microclimate, and thermal comfort can assist urban planning to make better use of green spaces for microclimate regulation.
TaalEngels
Pagina's87-101
TijdschriftInternational Journal of Biometeorology
Volume61
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - jan 2017

Vingerafdruk

Hot Temperature
microclimate
infrastructure
Microclimate
history
urban planning
temperature
City Planning
urban green
green space
Surveys and Questionnaires
climate
summer
Temperature
Climate
Netherlands
Sample Size
Linear Models
Emotions
Regression Analysis

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    Wang, Y. ; de Groot, R. ; Bakker, F. ; Wörtche, H.J. ; Leemans, R./ Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: a survey on a Dutch university campus. In: International Journal of Biometeorology. 2017 ; Vol. 61, Nr. 1. blz. 87-101
    @article{d83c39206eec477e80af840d8b6c73b4,
    title = "Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: a survey on a Dutch university campus",
    abstract = "To better understand the influence of urban green infrastructure (UGI) on outdoor human thermal comfort, a survey and physical measurements were performed at the campus of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in spring and summer 2015. Three hundred eighty-nine respondents were interviewed in five different green spaces. We aimed to analyze people’s thermal comfort perception and preference in outdoor urban green spaces, and to specify the combined effects between the thermal environmental and personal factors. The results imply that non-physical environmental and subjective factors (e.g., natural view, quiet environment, and emotional background) were more important in perceiving comfort than the actual thermal conditions. By applying a linear regression and probit analysis, the comfort temperature was found to be 22.2 °C and the preferred temperature was at a surprisingly high 35.7 °C. This can be explained by the observation that most respondents, who live in temperate regions, have a natural tendency to describe their preferred state as “warmer” even when feeling “warm” already. Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, the four significant factors influencing thermal comfort were people’s exposure time in green spaces, previous thermal environment and activity, and their thermal history. However, the effect of thermal history needs further investigation due to the unequal sample sizes of respondents from different climate regions. By providing evidence for the role of the objective and subjective factors on human thermal comfort, the relationship between UGI, microclimate, and thermal comfort can assist urban planning to make better use of green spaces for microclimate regulation.",
    keywords = "Outdoor thermal comfort, Urban green infrastructure, Thermal adaptation, emperate regions , Correlation analysis",
    author = "Y. Wang and {de Groot}, R. and F. Bakker and H.J. W{\"o}rtche and R. Leemans",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s00484-016-1193-0",
    language = "English",
    volume = "61",
    pages = "87--101",
    journal = "International Journal of Biometeorology",
    issn = "0020-7128",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "1",

    }

    Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: a survey on a Dutch university campus. / Wang, Y.; de Groot, R.; Bakker, F.; Wörtche, H.J.; Leemans, R.

    In: International Journal of Biometeorology, Vol. 61, Nr. 1, 01.2017, blz. 87-101.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Thermal comfort in urban green spaces: a survey on a Dutch university campus

    AU - Wang,Y.

    AU - de Groot,R.

    AU - Bakker,F.

    AU - Wörtche,H.J.

    AU - Leemans,R.

    PY - 2017/1

    Y1 - 2017/1

    N2 - To better understand the influence of urban green infrastructure (UGI) on outdoor human thermal comfort, a survey and physical measurements were performed at the campus of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in spring and summer 2015. Three hundred eighty-nine respondents were interviewed in five different green spaces. We aimed to analyze people’s thermal comfort perception and preference in outdoor urban green spaces, and to specify the combined effects between the thermal environmental and personal factors. The results imply that non-physical environmental and subjective factors (e.g., natural view, quiet environment, and emotional background) were more important in perceiving comfort than the actual thermal conditions. By applying a linear regression and probit analysis, the comfort temperature was found to be 22.2 °C and the preferred temperature was at a surprisingly high 35.7 °C. This can be explained by the observation that most respondents, who live in temperate regions, have a natural tendency to describe their preferred state as “warmer” even when feeling “warm” already. Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, the four significant factors influencing thermal comfort were people’s exposure time in green spaces, previous thermal environment and activity, and their thermal history. However, the effect of thermal history needs further investigation due to the unequal sample sizes of respondents from different climate regions. By providing evidence for the role of the objective and subjective factors on human thermal comfort, the relationship between UGI, microclimate, and thermal comfort can assist urban planning to make better use of green spaces for microclimate regulation.

    AB - To better understand the influence of urban green infrastructure (UGI) on outdoor human thermal comfort, a survey and physical measurements were performed at the campus of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in spring and summer 2015. Three hundred eighty-nine respondents were interviewed in five different green spaces. We aimed to analyze people’s thermal comfort perception and preference in outdoor urban green spaces, and to specify the combined effects between the thermal environmental and personal factors. The results imply that non-physical environmental and subjective factors (e.g., natural view, quiet environment, and emotional background) were more important in perceiving comfort than the actual thermal conditions. By applying a linear regression and probit analysis, the comfort temperature was found to be 22.2 °C and the preferred temperature was at a surprisingly high 35.7 °C. This can be explained by the observation that most respondents, who live in temperate regions, have a natural tendency to describe their preferred state as “warmer” even when feeling “warm” already. Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, the four significant factors influencing thermal comfort were people’s exposure time in green spaces, previous thermal environment and activity, and their thermal history. However, the effect of thermal history needs further investigation due to the unequal sample sizes of respondents from different climate regions. By providing evidence for the role of the objective and subjective factors on human thermal comfort, the relationship between UGI, microclimate, and thermal comfort can assist urban planning to make better use of green spaces for microclimate regulation.

    KW - Outdoor thermal comfort

    KW - Urban green infrastructure

    KW - Thermal adaptation

    KW - emperate regions

    KW - Correlation analysis

    U2 - 10.1007/s00484-016-1193-0

    DO - 10.1007/s00484-016-1193-0

    M3 - Article

    VL - 61

    SP - 87

    EP - 101

    JO - International Journal of Biometeorology

    T2 - International Journal of Biometeorology

    JF - International Journal of Biometeorology

    SN - 0020-7128

    IS - 1

    ER -