The rise, fall and sustainability of capital-resource economies

J. Pezzey, C.A.A.M. Withagen

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

59 Citaten (Scopus)


In debates about green accounting it is sometimes argued that a positive value of aggregate investments indicates that an economy is developing sustainably. Asheim (1994) and Pezzey (1994) have shown that this is wrong, using a version of the well-known Dasgupta–Heal economy (with one capital and one non-renewable resource stock) as a counterexample. Asheim’s proof referred to the unproved assumptions that in such an economy a higher rate of time preference induces higher initial consumption and vice versa, and that "optimal" consumption is initially rising and then falling. Here we show that these assumptions do hold true under certain circumstances, thereby also proving some of Dasgupta and Heal’s other conjectures about sustainability.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)513-527
TijdschriftScandinavian Journal of Economics
Nummer van het tijdschrift2
StatusGepubliceerd - 1998


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The rise, fall and sustainability of capital-resource economies'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit