The rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: drawing appropriate distinctions

Dunja Šešelja, Laszlo Kosolosky, Christian Straßer

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

25 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

The aim of this paper is to disambiguate between different notions of pursuit worthiness regarding scientific inquiries. To this end we propose a unifying pattern of pursuit worthiness: "It is rational for Y to pursue X if and only if pursuing X is conducive of the set of goals Z." By showing in which ways variables X, Y, and Z can be changed, we present different notions of pursuit and pursuit worthiness. With respect to variable X, we distinguish the pursuit of scientific theories, epistemic objects, and technological developments. With respect to variable Z, we distinguish between epistemic and practical pursuit worthiness. Finally, with respect to variable Y, we distinguish between individual and communal pursuit worthiness. By means of these distinctions we are able to explicate some of the major ambiguities underlying the concept of pursuit of pursuit worthiness, as well as to shed light on some confusions in philosophical literature that have resulted from their neglect.

Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)51-82
Aantal pagina's32
TijdschriftPhilosophica
Volume86
Nummer van het tijdschrift3
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 dec. 2012
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: drawing appropriate distinctions'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit