The moral importance of selecting people randomly

M.B. Peterson

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

10 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

This article discusses some ethical principles for distributing pandemic influenza vaccine and other indivisible goods. I argue that a number of principles for distributing pandemic influenza vaccine recently adopted by several national governments are morally unacceptable because they put too much emphasis on utilitarian considerations, such as the ability of the individual to contribute to society. Instead, it would be better to distribute vaccine by setting up a lottery. The argument for this view is based on a purely consequentialist account of morality; i.e. an action is right if and only if its outcome is optimal. However, unlike utilitarians I do not believe that alternatives should be ranked strictly according to the amount of happiness or preference satisfaction they bring about. Even a mere chance to get some vaccine matters morally, even if it is never realized.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)321-327
Aantal pagina's7
TijdschriftBioethics
Volume22
Nummer van het tijdschrift6
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2008

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The moral importance of selecting people randomly'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit