The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

M. Amerongen, van

doi:10.6100/IR636331

The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

M. Amerongen, van

Onderzoeksoutput: Scriptie › Dissertatie 1 (Onderzoek TU/e / Promotie TU/e)

1595 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett’s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.

Originele taal-2	Engels
Kwalificatie	Doctor in de Filosofie
Toekennende instantie	Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences
Begeleider(s)/adviseur	Meijers, Anthonie W.M., Promotor Illies, Christian, Co-Promotor
Datum van toekenning	19 aug. 2008
Plaats van publicatie	Eindhoven
Uitgever	Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Gedrukte ISBN's	978-90-386-1339-0
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.6100/IR636331
Status	Gepubliceerd - 2008

Bibliografische nota

Proefschrift.

Toegang tot document

10.6100/IR636331

200811190Definitieve gepubliceerde versie, 1,23 MB

Citeer dit

@phdthesis{2054c97014344abb9e20b7cf1ef00c3b,

title = "The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance",

abstract = "The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett{\textquoteright}s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.",

author = "\{Amerongen, van\}, M.",

note = "Proefschrift.",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.6100/IR636331",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-90-386-1339-0",

publisher = "Technische Universiteit Eindhoven",

type = "Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e)",

school = "Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences",

}

TY - THES

T1 - The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

AU - Amerongen, van, M.

N1 - Proefschrift.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett’s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.

AB - The Interpretation of Artifacts; A Critique of Dennett’s Design Stance Technological artifacts are a pervasive part of human life. They are, however, largely ignored in the analytic philosophical tradition, especially by philosophical naturalists. Being mind-dependent phenomena, tied up with human intentionality, analytic philosophers have largely found the topic unscientific, not objective, or simply trivial. An important exception is Daniel Dennett, who puts design at the heart of his naturalistic theory of mind.

U2 - 10.6100/IR636331

DO - 10.6100/IR636331

M3 - Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e)

SN - 978-90-386-1339-0

PB - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

CY - Eindhoven

ER -

The interpretation of artifacts : a critique of Dennett's design stance

Samenvatting

Bibliografische nota

Toegang tot document

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit