The ethics of crashes with self-driving cars: a roadmap I

S.R. Nyholm

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

895 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Self‐driving cars hold out the promise of being much safer than regular cars. Yet they cannot be 100% safe. Accordingly, they need to be programmed for how to deal with crash scenarios. Should cars be programmed to always prioritize their owners, to minimize harm, or to respond to crashes on the basis of some other type of principle? The article first discusses whether everyone should have the same “ethics settings.” Next, the oft‐made analogy with the trolley problem is examined. Then follows an assessment of recent empirical work on lay‐people's attitudes about crash algorithms relevant to the ethical issue of crash optimization. Finally, the article discusses what traditional ethical theories such as utilitarianism, Kantianism, virtue ethics, and contractualism imply about how cars should handle crash scenarios. The aim of the article is to provide an overview of the existing literature on these topics and to assess how far the discussion has gotten so far.

Originele taal-2Engels
Artikelnummere12507
Aantal pagina's10
TijdschriftPhilosophy Compass
Volume13
Nummer van het tijdschrift7
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - jul 2018

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The ethics of crashes with self-driving cars: a roadmap I'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit