The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem?

S.R. Nyholm, J. Smids

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

153 Citaten (Scopus)
1307 Downloads (Pure)


Self-driving cars hold out the promise of being safer than manually driven cars. Yet they cannot be a 100 % safe. Collisions are sometimes unavoidable. So self-driving cars need to be programmed for how they should respond to scenarios where collisions are highly likely or unavoidable. The accident-scenarios self-driving cars might face have recently been likened to the key examples and dilemmas associated with the trolley problem. In this article, we critically examine this tempting analogy. We identify three important ways in which the ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars and the philosophy of the trolley problem differ from each other. These concern: (i) the basic decision-making situation faced by those who decide how self-driving cars should be programmed to deal with accidents; (ii) moral and legal responsibility; and (iii) decision-making in the face of risks and uncertainty. In discussing these three areas of disanalogy, we isolate and identify a number of basic issues and complexities that arise within the ethics of the programming of self-driving cars.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)1275–1289
Aantal pagina's16
TijdschriftEthical Theory and Moral Practice
Nummer van het tijdschrift5
Vroegere onlinedatum28 jul. 2016
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 nov. 2016


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit