The context of social capital: a comparison of rural and urban entrepreneurs in Uganda

G. Rooks, K. Klyver, A. Sserwanga

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

40 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Classical network theory states that social networks are a form of capital because they provide access to resources. In this article, we propose that network effects differ between collectivistic and individualistic contexts. In a collectivistic context, resource sharing will be “value based.” It is expected that members of a group support each other and share resources. In contrast, in an individualistic context, resource sharing will be more often based on reciprocity and trust. Hence, we hypothesized that networks will be more beneficial in individual contexts compared with collectivistic context. We found partial support for our hypotheses.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)111-130
Aantal pagina's19
TijdschriftEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Volume40
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 21 jan 2016

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'The context of social capital: a comparison of rural and urban entrepreneurs in Uganda'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit