TY - JOUR
T1 - The analysis of terminal endpoint events in stepped wedge designs
AU - Zhan, Z.
AU - de Bock, G.H.
AU - Wiggers, T.
AU - van den Heuvel, E.R.
PY - 2016/10/30
Y1 - 2016/10/30
N2 - The stepped wedge design is a unique clinical trial design that allows for a sequential introduction of an intervention. However, the statistical analysis is unclear when this design is applied in survival data. The time-dependent introduction of the intervention in combination with terminal endpoints and interval censoring makes the analysis more complicated. In this paper, a time-on-study scale discrete survival model was constructed. Simulations were conducted primarily to study the performance of our model for different settings of the stepped wedge design. Secondary, we compared our approach to continuous Cox proportional hazard model. The results show that the discrete survival model estimates the intervention effects unbiasedly. If the length of the censoring interval is increased, the precision of the estimates is decreased. Without left truncation and late entry, the number of steps improves the precision of the estimates, whereas in combination of left truncation and late entry, the number of steps decreases the precision. Given the same number of participants and clusters, a parallel group design has higher precision than a stepped wedge design.
AB - The stepped wedge design is a unique clinical trial design that allows for a sequential introduction of an intervention. However, the statistical analysis is unclear when this design is applied in survival data. The time-dependent introduction of the intervention in combination with terminal endpoints and interval censoring makes the analysis more complicated. In this paper, a time-on-study scale discrete survival model was constructed. Simulations were conducted primarily to study the performance of our model for different settings of the stepped wedge design. Secondary, we compared our approach to continuous Cox proportional hazard model. The results show that the discrete survival model estimates the intervention effects unbiasedly. If the length of the censoring interval is increased, the precision of the estimates is decreased. Without left truncation and late entry, the number of steps improves the precision of the estimates, whereas in combination of left truncation and late entry, the number of steps decreases the precision. Given the same number of participants and clusters, a parallel group design has higher precision than a stepped wedge design.
KW - event history
KW - interval censored data
KW - stepped wedge design
KW - survival analysis
KW - time-dependent covariate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992134193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/sim.7004
DO - 10.1002/sim.7004
M3 - Article
C2 - 27311403
AN - SCOPUS:84992134193
SN - 0277-6715
VL - 35
SP - 4413
EP - 4426
JO - Statistics in Medicine
JF - Statistics in Medicine
IS - 24
ER -