Shining light on memory: Effects of bright light on working memory performance

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

31 Citaties (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Uittreksel

This study examined whether diurnal non-image forming (NIF) effects of illuminance level on cognitive task performance depend on task difficulty and time of day. We employed a balanced crossover design with two 60-min sessions of 200 vs. 1000 lux at eye level. Digit-span task difficulty was manipulated
within subjects (forward (FDST) vs. backward (BDST) digit-span task), n-back task difficulty was manipulated between subjects (n = 1, 2, or 3). Bright light exposure improved FDST performance during the final measurement block, especially in the afternoon. In contrast, BDST performance deteriorated slightly under bright light in the afternoon. Two-back performance was significantly worse under bright lighting the afternoon, while no effect of illuminance level was found on 3-back performance. Thus, the more difficult BDST was affected differently by light intensity as compared to the easier FDST. N-back accuracy, however, did not confirm this role of task difficulty. Future studies should investigate whether similar results hold for other types of tasks and how other variables (e.g., time of day, physiological arousal, or other task characteristics) may influence the direction and magnitude of NIF effects on performance.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)234-245
Aantal pagina's12
TijdschriftBehavioural Brain Research
Volume294
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 nov 2015

Vingerafdruk

Short-Term Memory
Light
Task Performance and Analysis
Arousal
Lighting
Cross-Over Studies

Citeer dit

@article{23f8908803bd47db9dd1404293df1351,
title = "Shining light on memory: Effects of bright light on working memory performance",
abstract = "This study examined whether diurnal non-image forming (NIF) effects of illuminance level on cognitive task performance depend on task difficulty and time of day. We employed a balanced crossover design with two 60-min sessions of 200 vs. 1000 lux at eye level. Digit-span task difficulty was manipulatedwithin subjects (forward (FDST) vs. backward (BDST) digit-span task), n-back task difficulty was manipulated between subjects (n = 1, 2, or 3). Bright light exposure improved FDST performance during the final measurement block, especially in the afternoon. In contrast, BDST performance deteriorated slightly under bright light in the afternoon. Two-back performance was significantly worse under bright lighting the afternoon, while no effect of illuminance level was found on 3-back performance. Thus, the more difficult BDST was affected differently by light intensity as compared to the easier FDST. N-back accuracy, however, did not confirm this role of task difficulty. Future studies should investigate whether similar results hold for other types of tasks and how other variables (e.g., time of day, physiological arousal, or other task characteristics) may influence the direction and magnitude of NIF effects on performance.",
keywords = "Lighting; Memory; Performance",
author = "L.M. Huiberts and K.C.H.J. Smolders and {de Kort}, Y.A.W.",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.045",
language = "English",
volume = "294",
pages = "234--245",
journal = "Behavioural Brain Research",
issn = "0166-4328",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Shining light on memory : Effects of bright light on working memory performance. / Huiberts, L.M.; Smolders, K.C.H.J.; de Kort, Y.A.W.

In: Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 294, 01.11.2015, blz. 234-245.

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shining light on memory

T2 - Effects of bright light on working memory performance

AU - Huiberts, L.M.

AU - Smolders, K.C.H.J.

AU - de Kort, Y.A.W.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - This study examined whether diurnal non-image forming (NIF) effects of illuminance level on cognitive task performance depend on task difficulty and time of day. We employed a balanced crossover design with two 60-min sessions of 200 vs. 1000 lux at eye level. Digit-span task difficulty was manipulatedwithin subjects (forward (FDST) vs. backward (BDST) digit-span task), n-back task difficulty was manipulated between subjects (n = 1, 2, or 3). Bright light exposure improved FDST performance during the final measurement block, especially in the afternoon. In contrast, BDST performance deteriorated slightly under bright light in the afternoon. Two-back performance was significantly worse under bright lighting the afternoon, while no effect of illuminance level was found on 3-back performance. Thus, the more difficult BDST was affected differently by light intensity as compared to the easier FDST. N-back accuracy, however, did not confirm this role of task difficulty. Future studies should investigate whether similar results hold for other types of tasks and how other variables (e.g., time of day, physiological arousal, or other task characteristics) may influence the direction and magnitude of NIF effects on performance.

AB - This study examined whether diurnal non-image forming (NIF) effects of illuminance level on cognitive task performance depend on task difficulty and time of day. We employed a balanced crossover design with two 60-min sessions of 200 vs. 1000 lux at eye level. Digit-span task difficulty was manipulatedwithin subjects (forward (FDST) vs. backward (BDST) digit-span task), n-back task difficulty was manipulated between subjects (n = 1, 2, or 3). Bright light exposure improved FDST performance during the final measurement block, especially in the afternoon. In contrast, BDST performance deteriorated slightly under bright light in the afternoon. Two-back performance was significantly worse under bright lighting the afternoon, while no effect of illuminance level was found on 3-back performance. Thus, the more difficult BDST was affected differently by light intensity as compared to the easier FDST. N-back accuracy, however, did not confirm this role of task difficulty. Future studies should investigate whether similar results hold for other types of tasks and how other variables (e.g., time of day, physiological arousal, or other task characteristics) may influence the direction and magnitude of NIF effects on performance.

KW - Lighting; Memory; Performance

U2 - 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.045

DO - 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.045

M3 - Article

C2 - 26215575

VL - 294

SP - 234

EP - 245

JO - Behavioural Brain Research

JF - Behavioural Brain Research

SN - 0166-4328

ER -