Response to "comment on Comparison between solutions of the general dynamic equation and the kinetic equation for nucleation and droplet growth' " [J. Chem. Phys. 132, 047101 (2010)]

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftArtikel recenserenAcademicpeer review

1 Citaat (Scopus)

Samenvatting

The analytical results presented in the comment of Shneidman for the droplet size distribution, the thickness of the distribution front, and the location of the stationary source are compared to our earlier numerical results. The agreement is very good in the case of the size distribution and the source location, but the analytical result for the thickness of the front deviates from the numerical result at high supersaturations.

Originele taal-2Engels
Artikelnummer047102
TijdschriftJournal of Chemical Physics
Volume132
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 8 feb 2010

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Response to "comment on Comparison between solutions of the general dynamic equation and the kinetic equation for nucleation and droplet growth' " [J. Chem. Phys. 132, 047101 (2010)]'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

  • Citeer dit