Reflections on a reflective cycle: building legitimacy in design knowledge development

S. Heusinkveld, H.A. Reijers

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

18 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

In this article we seek to develop a better understanding of how design knowledge development (DKD) ventures may gain ‘good currency’. The reflective cycle is generally considered to be a key element in the accumulation of design knowledge and crucial to the interface of science and design. However, the elements that may encourage or inhibit the enactment of this cycle in development ventures have received scant attention in the literature on organizational design. In our analysis, we show how DKD ventures face important barriers related to the institutional context and institutional entrepreneurship. We argue that the current conceptualizations and practices of knowledge development in organizational design need to pay much more attention to building legitimacy.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)865-886
Aantal pagina's22
TijdschriftOrganization Studies
Volume30
Nummer van het tijdschrift8
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2009

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Reflections on a reflective cycle: building legitimacy in design knowledge development'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit