People May Punish, Not Blame, Robots

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/CongresprocedureConferentiebijdrageAcademicpeer review

78 Downloads (Pure)


As robots may take a greater part in our moral decision-making processes, whether people hold them accountable for moral harm becomes critical to explore. Blame and punishment signify moral accountability, often involving emotions. We quantitatively looked into people’s willingness to blame or punish an emotional vs. non-emotional robot that admits to its wrongdoing. Studies 1 and 2 (online video interaction) showed that people may punish a robot due to its lack of perceived emotional capacity than its perceived agency. Study 3 (in the lab) demonstrated that people were neither willing to blame nor punish the robot. Punishing non-emotional robots seems more likely than blaming them, yet punishment towards robots is more likely to arise online than offline. We reflect on if and why victimized humans (and those who care for them) may seek out retributive justice against robot scapegoats when there are no humans to hold accountable for moral harm.
Originele taal-2Engels
TitelConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
UitgeverijAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Aantal pagina's11
StatusGeaccepteerd/In druk - 11 mrt 2021
EvenementACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2021 - Yokohama, Japan
Duur: 8 mei 202113 mei 2021


CongresACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2021
Verkorte titelCHI 2021
Internet adres

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'People May Punish, Not Blame, Robots'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit