Pacing style diversity and team collaboration: The moderating effects of temporal familiarity and action planning.

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

3 Citaties (Scopus)

Uittreksel

This study addresses the value of both task- and team-focused processes in dealing with temporal diversity in teams. Particularly, we focus on team diversity in pacing styles (i.e., team members’ differences in how to distribute efforts over the available time in working toward deadlines). In a cross-sectional survey study of 38 consultancy teams, we examined the joint moderating effects of action planning and temporal familiarity on the relationship between pacing style diversity and team collaboration. Pacing style diversity tended to be negatively associated with team collaboration under most levels of action planning and temporal familiarity. Pacing style diversity and team collaboration related positively only when both action planning and temporal familiarity were high. This moderating effect was mediated by temporal consensus (i.e., team members’ shared understanding of the temporal aspects of executing collective tasks). Thus, the co-occurrence of action planning and temporal familiarity is particularly important for temporally heterogeneous teams to collaborate effectively by facilitating a shared perspective on the team’s temporal approach to the task.
TaalEngels
Pagina's78-92
TijdschriftGroup Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice
Volume20
Nummer van het tijdschrift2
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 jun 2016

Vingerafdruk

Cross-Sectional Studies
Recognition (Psychology)
Consensus

Citeer dit

@article{09a16ef4d93347e9bb290bc8d9ee57d3,
title = "Pacing style diversity and team collaboration: The moderating effects of temporal familiarity and action planning.",
abstract = "This study addresses the value of both task- and team-focused processes in dealing with temporal diversity in teams. Particularly, we focus on team diversity in pacing styles (i.e., team members’ differences in how to distribute efforts over the available time in working toward deadlines). In a cross-sectional survey study of 38 consultancy teams, we examined the joint moderating effects of action planning and temporal familiarity on the relationship between pacing style diversity and team collaboration. Pacing style diversity tended to be negatively associated with team collaboration under most levels of action planning and temporal familiarity. Pacing style diversity and team collaboration related positively only when both action planning and temporal familiarity were high. This moderating effect was mediated by temporal consensus (i.e., team members’ shared understanding of the temporal aspects of executing collective tasks). Thus, the co-occurrence of action planning and temporal familiarity is particularly important for temporally heterogeneous teams to collaborate effectively by facilitating a shared perspective on the team’s temporal approach to the task.",
author = "J.M.P. Gevers and S. Rispens and J. Li",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/gdn0000049",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "78--92",
journal = "Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice",
issn = "1089-2699",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "2",

}

Pacing style diversity and team collaboration : The moderating effects of temporal familiarity and action planning. / Gevers, J.M.P.; Rispens, S.; Li, J.

In: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, Vol. 20, Nr. 2, 01.06.2016, blz. 78-92.

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pacing style diversity and team collaboration

T2 - Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice

AU - Gevers,J.M.P.

AU - Rispens,S.

AU - Li,J.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - This study addresses the value of both task- and team-focused processes in dealing with temporal diversity in teams. Particularly, we focus on team diversity in pacing styles (i.e., team members’ differences in how to distribute efforts over the available time in working toward deadlines). In a cross-sectional survey study of 38 consultancy teams, we examined the joint moderating effects of action planning and temporal familiarity on the relationship between pacing style diversity and team collaboration. Pacing style diversity tended to be negatively associated with team collaboration under most levels of action planning and temporal familiarity. Pacing style diversity and team collaboration related positively only when both action planning and temporal familiarity were high. This moderating effect was mediated by temporal consensus (i.e., team members’ shared understanding of the temporal aspects of executing collective tasks). Thus, the co-occurrence of action planning and temporal familiarity is particularly important for temporally heterogeneous teams to collaborate effectively by facilitating a shared perspective on the team’s temporal approach to the task.

AB - This study addresses the value of both task- and team-focused processes in dealing with temporal diversity in teams. Particularly, we focus on team diversity in pacing styles (i.e., team members’ differences in how to distribute efforts over the available time in working toward deadlines). In a cross-sectional survey study of 38 consultancy teams, we examined the joint moderating effects of action planning and temporal familiarity on the relationship between pacing style diversity and team collaboration. Pacing style diversity tended to be negatively associated with team collaboration under most levels of action planning and temporal familiarity. Pacing style diversity and team collaboration related positively only when both action planning and temporal familiarity were high. This moderating effect was mediated by temporal consensus (i.e., team members’ shared understanding of the temporal aspects of executing collective tasks). Thus, the co-occurrence of action planning and temporal familiarity is particularly important for temporally heterogeneous teams to collaborate effectively by facilitating a shared perspective on the team’s temporal approach to the task.

U2 - 10.1037/gdn0000049

DO - 10.1037/gdn0000049

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 78

EP - 92

JO - Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice

JF - Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice

SN - 1089-2699

IS - 2

ER -