Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/CongresprocedureConferentiebijdrageAcademicpeer review

Samenvatting

By means of a case study involving a severe case of coupled heat and air flow in buildings, this paper aims to quantify the differences resulting from different methods (ping-pong and onion approach) for linking heat and air flow models. The main conclusion is that when used improperly, the onion method will have implications in terms of computing resources, but - more seriously - the ping-pong method may generate substantial errors.
Originele taal-2Engels
TitelProc. 16th Conf. Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research
Plaats van productiePalm Spring
UitgeverijAir Infiltration and Ventilation Centre (AIVC )
Pagina's253-262
StatusGepubliceerd - 1995
Evenementconference; Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research -
Duur: 1 jan 1995 → …

Congres

Congresconference; Implementing the Results of Ventilation Research
Periode1/01/95 → …
AnderImplementing the Results of Ventilation Research

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Modelling coupled heat and airflow: ping-pong vs onions'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit