@inproceedings{0b5f8b2c753849d3ae08177d155f3d9e,
title = "Making metaethics work for AI: Realism and anti-realism",
abstract = "Engineering an artificial intelligence to play an advisory role in morally charged decision making will inevitably introduce meta-ethical positions into the design. Some of these positions, by informing the design and operation of the AI, will introduce risks. This paper offers an analysis of these potential risks along the realism/anti-realism dimension in metaethics and reveals that realism poses greater risks, but, on the other hand, anti-realism undermines the motivation for engineering a moral AI in the first place.",
keywords = "Artificial intelligence, Engineering, Metaethics, Risk",
author = "M.W. Klincewicz and L.E. Frank",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-931-7-311",
language = "English",
series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "311--318",
editor = "Michael Funk and Janina Loh and Marco Norskov and Mark Coeckelbergh and Johanna Seibt",
booktitle = "Envisioning Robots in Society - Power, Politics, and Public Space - Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2018 / TRANSOR 2018",
address = "Netherlands",
note = "3rd International Conference on Robophilosophy 2018 / Transor 2018: Envisioning Robots in Society - Politics, Power, and Public Space ; Conference date: 14-02-2018 Through 17-02-2018",
}