Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces?

Laura Estévez-Mauriz, Jens Forssén, Maud E. Dohmen

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

2 Citaties (Scopus)

Uittreksel

Rapid and intrusive spatial adjustments in common spaces are increasingly questioned by the awareness of citizens demanding higher quality standards. This study aims to understand the use of common space by identifying how the sound environment affects the functions of space and the interaction with other environmental and spatial variables. Is there a certain sound environment required or that should be avoided when designing a space for a specific activity? In situ evaluations with regular users were collected in nine common spaces in Gothenburg, Sweden, conducting sound recordings and questionnaires. Site selection responded to the purpose of the analysed places, the noise level (LAeq) of the city road traffic noise map, and the number of activities suggested by the city sociotope maps. The analyses revealed that certain activities could be identified from LAeq values. Discriminant functions with respect to sound levels primarily identified a tranquil/restorative vibrant dimension, where the highest noise levels tend to be at the most vibrant end. Other results showed that a considerable variability of overall and visual quality judgements came from the variability in sites. These quality assessments were highly correlated, allowing both to be analysed as a single attribute. The variability in sound quality was much lower. Notable is the difference between recorded and perceived loudness. In addition, poor sound quality judgement does not seem to correlate with the perception of mechanical sources as the main source of noise.

TaalEngels
Pagina's307-337
TijdschriftBuilding Acoustics
Volume25
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 dec 2018

Vingerafdruk

Acoustic waves
acoustics
Sound recording
Site selection
site selection
loudness
Sweden
roads
traffic
adjusting
recording
conduction
evaluation
interactions

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    Estévez-Mauriz, L., Forssén, J., & Dohmen, M. E. (2018). Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces? Building Acoustics, 25(4), 307-337. DOI: 10.1177/1351010X18790832
    Estévez-Mauriz, Laura ; Forssén, Jens ; Dohmen, Maud E./ Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces?. In: Building Acoustics. 2018 ; Vol. 25, Nr. 4. blz. 307-337
    @article{3445fbca7d294bdca033666f1c2c8554,
    title = "Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces?",
    abstract = "Rapid and intrusive spatial adjustments in common spaces are increasingly questioned by the awareness of citizens demanding higher quality standards. This study aims to understand the use of common space by identifying how the sound environment affects the functions of space and the interaction with other environmental and spatial variables. Is there a certain sound environment required or that should be avoided when designing a space for a specific activity? In situ evaluations with regular users were collected in nine common spaces in Gothenburg, Sweden, conducting sound recordings and questionnaires. Site selection responded to the purpose of the analysed places, the noise level (LAeq) of the city road traffic noise map, and the number of activities suggested by the city sociotope maps. The analyses revealed that certain activities could be identified from LAeq values. Discriminant functions with respect to sound levels primarily identified a tranquil/restorative vibrant dimension, where the highest noise levels tend to be at the most vibrant end. Other results showed that a considerable variability of overall and visual quality judgements came from the variability in sites. These quality assessments were highly correlated, allowing both to be analysed as a single attribute. The variability in sound quality was much lower. Notable is the difference between recorded and perceived loudness. In addition, poor sound quality judgement does not seem to correlate with the perception of mechanical sources as the main source of noise.",
    keywords = "common spaces, functionality of spaces, perceptual evaluation, Urban sound environment",
    author = "Laura Est{\'e}vez-Mauriz and Jens Forss{\'e}n and Dohmen, {Maud E.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1351010X18790832",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "307--337",
    journal = "Building Acoustics",
    issn = "1351-010X",
    publisher = "Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd",
    number = "4",

    }

    Estévez-Mauriz, L, Forssén, J & Dohmen, ME 2018, 'Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces?' Building Acoustics, vol. 25, nr. 4, blz. 307-337. DOI: 10.1177/1351010X18790832

    Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces? / Estévez-Mauriz, Laura; Forssén, Jens; Dohmen, Maud E.

    In: Building Acoustics, Vol. 25, Nr. 4, 01.12.2018, blz. 307-337.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces?

    AU - Estévez-Mauriz,Laura

    AU - Forssén,Jens

    AU - Dohmen,Maud E.

    PY - 2018/12/1

    Y1 - 2018/12/1

    N2 - Rapid and intrusive spatial adjustments in common spaces are increasingly questioned by the awareness of citizens demanding higher quality standards. This study aims to understand the use of common space by identifying how the sound environment affects the functions of space and the interaction with other environmental and spatial variables. Is there a certain sound environment required or that should be avoided when designing a space for a specific activity? In situ evaluations with regular users were collected in nine common spaces in Gothenburg, Sweden, conducting sound recordings and questionnaires. Site selection responded to the purpose of the analysed places, the noise level (LAeq) of the city road traffic noise map, and the number of activities suggested by the city sociotope maps. The analyses revealed that certain activities could be identified from LAeq values. Discriminant functions with respect to sound levels primarily identified a tranquil/restorative vibrant dimension, where the highest noise levels tend to be at the most vibrant end. Other results showed that a considerable variability of overall and visual quality judgements came from the variability in sites. These quality assessments were highly correlated, allowing both to be analysed as a single attribute. The variability in sound quality was much lower. Notable is the difference between recorded and perceived loudness. In addition, poor sound quality judgement does not seem to correlate with the perception of mechanical sources as the main source of noise.

    AB - Rapid and intrusive spatial adjustments in common spaces are increasingly questioned by the awareness of citizens demanding higher quality standards. This study aims to understand the use of common space by identifying how the sound environment affects the functions of space and the interaction with other environmental and spatial variables. Is there a certain sound environment required or that should be avoided when designing a space for a specific activity? In situ evaluations with regular users were collected in nine common spaces in Gothenburg, Sweden, conducting sound recordings and questionnaires. Site selection responded to the purpose of the analysed places, the noise level (LAeq) of the city road traffic noise map, and the number of activities suggested by the city sociotope maps. The analyses revealed that certain activities could be identified from LAeq values. Discriminant functions with respect to sound levels primarily identified a tranquil/restorative vibrant dimension, where the highest noise levels tend to be at the most vibrant end. Other results showed that a considerable variability of overall and visual quality judgements came from the variability in sites. These quality assessments were highly correlated, allowing both to be analysed as a single attribute. The variability in sound quality was much lower. Notable is the difference between recorded and perceived loudness. In addition, poor sound quality judgement does not seem to correlate with the perception of mechanical sources as the main source of noise.

    KW - common spaces

    KW - functionality of spaces

    KW - perceptual evaluation

    KW - Urban sound environment

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053180734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1351010X18790832

    DO - 10.1177/1351010X18790832

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 307

    EP - 337

    JO - Building Acoustics

    T2 - Building Acoustics

    JF - Building Acoustics

    SN - 1351-010X

    IS - 4

    ER -

    Estévez-Mauriz L, Forssén J, Dohmen ME. Is the sound environment relevant for how people use common spaces? Building Acoustics. 2018 dec 1;25(4):307-337. Beschikbaar vanaf, DOI: 10.1177/1351010X18790832