Is labour market flexibility harmful to innovation?

A.H. Kleinknecht

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    112 Citaten (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Samenvatting

    In a neoclassical framework one can argue that unemployment can be reduced by means of institutional changes that allow for a better working of the labour market and, notably, by achieving downward wage flexibility. I argue that although various policy recommendations about removing labour market rigidities are indeed advantageous in the short trun, they are detrimental from a Schumpeterian perspective, since they discourage product and process innovation. Reduced innovation efforts will in turn weaken the supply-side strength of an economy. The paper explores the implications of Schumpeter's notion of creative destruction and of Schmookler's hypothesis of demand-pulled innovations, borrowing from recent empirical innovation research.
    Originele taal-2Engels
    Pagina's (van-tot)387-396
    Aantal pagina's10
    TijdschriftCambridge Journal of Economics
    Volume22
    Nummer van het tijdschrift3
    StatusGepubliceerd - 1998

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Is labour market flexibility harmful to innovation?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit