TY - GEN
T1 - Industrialization for sustainable construction?
AU - Egmond - de Wilde De Ligny, van, E.L.C.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Sustainable construction (SuCo), which genesis dates in the early 1990’s, advocates the creation and
operation of a quality and healthy built environment based on resource efficiency, life cycle economics and ecological principles. (Kibert, 2003). Currently the Construction Industry does not meet all these principles. This implies the need for change, thus innovation for SuCo. The purpose of
our study is to explore the opportunities and constraints of a paradigm innovation such as towards
industrialised construction to achieve SuCo. The particular issue that is dealt is whether the stakeholders in the CI are indeed willing and ready for a paradigm shift, i.e. a change in the underlying metal models. Have of will they put it into practice by developing and applying industrialised standardized construction technologies. Are there in one way or the other incentives – such as government policies and regulations- that further stimulate such SuCo practices? After all
industrialised production in manufacturing sectors has proven to contribute to enhanced efficiency
and effectiveness of the processes, thereby minimizing the use of labour and material resources and
waste. Thus in the same line of thinking a paradigm shift towards innovative industrialised construction is assumed to contribute to achieve the SuCo objectives. To find answers to the questions the sustainability practices in the construction industry in the Netherlands and Chile were
investigated. Methodologically the research drew on a merge of concepts of the Production
Management and Innovation Theories. The findings have underpinned that -although the major driving factor for the stakeholders to change the construction processes was cost reduction- the
measures to minimize losses in primary materials and material use by industrialised construction
which takes into account the environmental aspects contributes to the achievement of the SuCo
objectives. The conclusion is that SuCo in the CI requires the implementation of innovative solutions
and project execution that goes beyond the traditional and generally accepted way of building. This
calls for a paradigm shift amongst construction stakeholders which cannot be accomplished without a stimulating, supporting and regulating framework.
AB - Sustainable construction (SuCo), which genesis dates in the early 1990’s, advocates the creation and
operation of a quality and healthy built environment based on resource efficiency, life cycle economics and ecological principles. (Kibert, 2003). Currently the Construction Industry does not meet all these principles. This implies the need for change, thus innovation for SuCo. The purpose of
our study is to explore the opportunities and constraints of a paradigm innovation such as towards
industrialised construction to achieve SuCo. The particular issue that is dealt is whether the stakeholders in the CI are indeed willing and ready for a paradigm shift, i.e. a change in the underlying metal models. Have of will they put it into practice by developing and applying industrialised standardized construction technologies. Are there in one way or the other incentives – such as government policies and regulations- that further stimulate such SuCo practices? After all
industrialised production in manufacturing sectors has proven to contribute to enhanced efficiency
and effectiveness of the processes, thereby minimizing the use of labour and material resources and
waste. Thus in the same line of thinking a paradigm shift towards innovative industrialised construction is assumed to contribute to achieve the SuCo objectives. To find answers to the questions the sustainability practices in the construction industry in the Netherlands and Chile were
investigated. Methodologically the research drew on a merge of concepts of the Production
Management and Innovation Theories. The findings have underpinned that -although the major driving factor for the stakeholders to change the construction processes was cost reduction- the
measures to minimize losses in primary materials and material use by industrialised construction
which takes into account the environmental aspects contributes to the achievement of the SuCo
objectives. The conclusion is that SuCo in the CI requires the implementation of innovative solutions
and project execution that goes beyond the traditional and generally accepted way of building. This
calls for a paradigm shift amongst construction stakeholders which cannot be accomplished without a stimulating, supporting and regulating framework.
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - CIB Proceedings
SP - 52
EP - 63
BT - Proceedings of the Industrialisation in Construction, 10-13 May 2010, Salford, United Kingdom
A2 - Barrett, P
A2 - Amaratunga, D.
A2 - Haigh, R
A2 - Keraminiyage, K.
A2 - Pathirage, C
PB - International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB)
CY - Rotterdam
T2 - 18th CIB World Building Congress, May 10-13, 2010, Salford, UK
Y2 - 10 May 2010 through 13 May 2010
ER -