Samenvatting
Three methods for early-stage building spatial design optimization are presented, demonstrated, and compared for their qualities and limitations. The first, an evolutionary algorithm, can find well-distributed approximations of the Pareto front, but it uses many design evaluations and it can only explore a limited part of the entire design search space (i.e. the collection of all possible design solutions). The second, simulations of co-evolutionary design processes, can find improved design solutions relatively fast within an unrestricted design search space, however, they typically only find discretely distributed Pareto front approximations. For the third method, hybridization is proposed to combine the first two methods into two new hybrid methods, such that their advantages are combined and their disadvantages are diminished. The methods have been applied in an initial case study, which shows that hybridization can improve search efficiency and speed, and it can search larger design search spaces.
Originele taal-2 | Engels |
---|---|
Artikelnummer | 103522 |
Aantal pagina's | 18 |
Tijdschrift | Automation in Construction |
Volume | 124 |
DOI's | |
Status | Gepubliceerd - apr. 2021 |
Bibliografische nota
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 The Author(s)
Financiering
This work is part of the TTW-Open Technology Program with project number 13596, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Moreover, the authors would like to acknowledge D.P.H Claessens MSc. Th.Y. de Goede MSc. and T.W. Snel MSc. for their contributions to the toolbox. This work is part of the TTW-Open Technology Program with project number 13596 , which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) . Moreover, the authors would like to acknowledge D.P.H Claessens MSc., Th.Y. de Goede MSc. and T.W. Snel MSc. for their contributions to the toolbox.