How do policies help to increase the uptake of carbon reduction measures in the EU residential sector? Evidence from recent studies

Erik Laes, Inge Mayeres, Nele Renders, Pieter Valkering, Stijn Verbeke

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftArtikel recenserenAcademicpeer review

Uittreksel

The residential sector is one of the EU's priority sectors where carbon mitigation needs to be realised. In this paper, we carry out a review of the effectiveness of individual policies or policy packages in terms of the uptake of these carbon mitigation measures and/or energy savings realised as a result. The focus lies on the existing residential building stock. The literature reviewed in this paper covers panel data studies, applied behavioural research, and situated approaches. Most of the reviewed quantitative studies find that financial incentives and subsidies have a positive impact on the probability of energy efficiency improvements being undertaken. However, when evaluating the energy efficiency improvements or CO2 reductions induced by the incentives and therefore their effectiveness, the presence of free riding turns out to be a problem. Energy and CO2 taxation should play a larger role in encouraging people to save energy and reduce CO2 emissions, since the reviewed studies indicate that people are responsive to savings in energy costs and expected price increases in the future. The evidence on the relative impact of regulation vs. financial incentives is inconclusive. For information policies the quantitative evidence is still limited. The reviewed panel data studies find no or a negative impact. This finding however does not necessarily imply that information policies are useless, as panel data do not allow for a detailed analysis of different types of informational approaches. Situated accounts provide further necessary qualitative findings on best practices for energy savings by households.

TaalEngels
Pagina's234-250
Aantal pagina's17
TijdschriftRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume94
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 okt 2018

Vingerafdruk

Energy efficiency
Energy conservation
Behavioral research
Carbon
Taxation
Costs

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    @article{eb350cf427b14f548da32cbea4c45b69,
    title = "How do policies help to increase the uptake of carbon reduction measures in the EU residential sector? Evidence from recent studies",
    abstract = "The residential sector is one of the EU's priority sectors where carbon mitigation needs to be realised. In this paper, we carry out a review of the effectiveness of individual policies or policy packages in terms of the uptake of these carbon mitigation measures and/or energy savings realised as a result. The focus lies on the existing residential building stock. The literature reviewed in this paper covers panel data studies, applied behavioural research, and situated approaches. Most of the reviewed quantitative studies find that financial incentives and subsidies have a positive impact on the probability of energy efficiency improvements being undertaken. However, when evaluating the energy efficiency improvements or CO2 reductions induced by the incentives and therefore their effectiveness, the presence of free riding turns out to be a problem. Energy and CO2 taxation should play a larger role in encouraging people to save energy and reduce CO2 emissions, since the reviewed studies indicate that people are responsive to savings in energy costs and expected price increases in the future. The evidence on the relative impact of regulation vs. financial incentives is inconclusive. For information policies the quantitative evidence is still limited. The reviewed panel data studies find no or a negative impact. This finding however does not necessarily imply that information policies are useless, as panel data do not allow for a detailed analysis of different types of informational approaches. Situated accounts provide further necessary qualitative findings on best practices for energy savings by households.",
    keywords = "Applied behavioural research, Energy efficiency, Panel data studies, Residential sector, Situated accounts",
    author = "Erik Laes and Inge Mayeres and Nele Renders and Pieter Valkering and Stijn Verbeke",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.046",
    language = "English",
    volume = "94",
    pages = "234--250",
    journal = "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews",
    issn = "1364-0321",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    How do policies help to increase the uptake of carbon reduction measures in the EU residential sector? Evidence from recent studies. / Laes, Erik; Mayeres, Inge; Renders, Nele; Valkering, Pieter; Verbeke, Stijn.

    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 94, 01.10.2018, blz. 234-250.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftArtikel recenserenAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How do policies help to increase the uptake of carbon reduction measures in the EU residential sector? Evidence from recent studies

    AU - Laes,Erik

    AU - Mayeres,Inge

    AU - Renders,Nele

    AU - Valkering,Pieter

    AU - Verbeke,Stijn

    PY - 2018/10/1

    Y1 - 2018/10/1

    N2 - The residential sector is one of the EU's priority sectors where carbon mitigation needs to be realised. In this paper, we carry out a review of the effectiveness of individual policies or policy packages in terms of the uptake of these carbon mitigation measures and/or energy savings realised as a result. The focus lies on the existing residential building stock. The literature reviewed in this paper covers panel data studies, applied behavioural research, and situated approaches. Most of the reviewed quantitative studies find that financial incentives and subsidies have a positive impact on the probability of energy efficiency improvements being undertaken. However, when evaluating the energy efficiency improvements or CO2 reductions induced by the incentives and therefore their effectiveness, the presence of free riding turns out to be a problem. Energy and CO2 taxation should play a larger role in encouraging people to save energy and reduce CO2 emissions, since the reviewed studies indicate that people are responsive to savings in energy costs and expected price increases in the future. The evidence on the relative impact of regulation vs. financial incentives is inconclusive. For information policies the quantitative evidence is still limited. The reviewed panel data studies find no or a negative impact. This finding however does not necessarily imply that information policies are useless, as panel data do not allow for a detailed analysis of different types of informational approaches. Situated accounts provide further necessary qualitative findings on best practices for energy savings by households.

    AB - The residential sector is one of the EU's priority sectors where carbon mitigation needs to be realised. In this paper, we carry out a review of the effectiveness of individual policies or policy packages in terms of the uptake of these carbon mitigation measures and/or energy savings realised as a result. The focus lies on the existing residential building stock. The literature reviewed in this paper covers panel data studies, applied behavioural research, and situated approaches. Most of the reviewed quantitative studies find that financial incentives and subsidies have a positive impact on the probability of energy efficiency improvements being undertaken. However, when evaluating the energy efficiency improvements or CO2 reductions induced by the incentives and therefore their effectiveness, the presence of free riding turns out to be a problem. Energy and CO2 taxation should play a larger role in encouraging people to save energy and reduce CO2 emissions, since the reviewed studies indicate that people are responsive to savings in energy costs and expected price increases in the future. The evidence on the relative impact of regulation vs. financial incentives is inconclusive. For information policies the quantitative evidence is still limited. The reviewed panel data studies find no or a negative impact. This finding however does not necessarily imply that information policies are useless, as panel data do not allow for a detailed analysis of different types of informational approaches. Situated accounts provide further necessary qualitative findings on best practices for energy savings by households.

    KW - Applied behavioural research

    KW - Energy efficiency

    KW - Panel data studies

    KW - Residential sector

    KW - Situated accounts

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048336376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.046

    DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.046

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 94

    SP - 234

    EP - 250

    JO - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

    T2 - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

    JF - Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

    SN - 1364-0321

    ER -