Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task

Irene A. Kuling; Kaj Gijsbertse; Bouke N. Krom; Kees J. van Teeffelen; Jan B.F. van Erp

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task

Irene A. Kuling, Kaj Gijsbertse, Bouke N. Krom, Kees J. van Teeffelen, Jan B.F. van Erp

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/Congresprocedure › Conferentiebijdrage › Academic › peer review

6 Citaten (Scopus)

53 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Haptic feedback is a desired feature in teleoperation as it can improve dexterous manipulation. Direct force feedback to the operator’s hand and fingers requires complex hardware and therefore substituting force by for instance vibration is a relevant topic. In this experiment, we tested performance on a Box & Blocks task in a teleoperation set-up with no feedback, direct force feedback and substituted vibration feedback. Objective performance was the same in all conditions as was the learning effect over three sessions, but participants had a clear preference for haptic feedback over no haptic feedback. The preferred type of feedback (force or vibration or both) varied over participants. In general, this study showed that haptic feedback is preferred in teleoperation, the Box & Blocks task seems not sensitive enough for our (and most) current teleoperation set-up(s), and vibration feedback as substitute for direct force feedback works well and can be used intuitively.

Originele taal-2	Engels
Titel	Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications
Subtitel	12th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2020, Leiden, The Netherlands, September 6–9, 2020, Proceedings
Redacteuren	Ilana Nisky, Jess Hartcher-O’Brien, Michaël Wiertlewski, Jeroen Smeets
Plaats van productie	Cham
Uitgeverij	Springer
Hoofdstuk	11
Pagina's	96-104
Aantal pagina's	9
ISBN van elektronische versie	978-3-030-58147-3
ISBN van geprinte versie	978-3-030-58146-6
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11
Status	Gepubliceerd - 2020
Extern gepubliceerd	Ja
Evenement	EuroHaptics - Leiden, Nederland Duur: 6 sep. 2020 → 9 sep. 2020 Congresnummer: 12

Publicatie series

Naam	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)
Uitgeverij	Springer
Volume	12272
ISSN van geprinte versie	0302-9743
ISSN van elektronische versie	1611-3349

Congres

Congres	EuroHaptics
Verkorte titel	EuroHaptics 2020
Land/Regio	Nederland
Stad	Leiden
Periode	6/09/20 → 9/09/20

Toegang tot document

10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

pdfDefinitieve gepubliceerde versie, 569 KB

Andere bestanden en links

Link naar publicatie in Scopus

Citeer dit

Kuling, I. A., Gijsbertse, K., Krom, B. N., van Teeffelen, K. J., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2020). Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task. In I. Nisky, J. Hartcher-O’Brien, M. Wiertlewski, & J. Smeets (editors), Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications: 12th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2020, Leiden, The Netherlands, September 6–9, 2020, Proceedings (blz. 96-104). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS); Vol. 12272). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

Kuling, Irene A. ; Gijsbertse, Kaj ; Krom, Bouke N. et al. / Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task. Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications: 12th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2020, Leiden, The Netherlands, September 6–9, 2020, Proceedings. redacteur / Ilana Nisky ; Jess Hartcher-O’Brien ; Michaël Wiertlewski ; Jeroen Smeets. Cham : Springer, 2020. blz. 96-104 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)).

@inproceedings{63048d3fa0a04a25b213c41f03a4b8aa,

title = "Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task",

abstract = "Haptic feedback is a desired feature in teleoperation as it can improve dexterous manipulation. Direct force feedback to the operator{\textquoteright}s hand and fingers requires complex hardware and therefore substituting force by for instance vibration is a relevant topic. In this experiment, we tested performance on a Box & Blocks task in a teleoperation set-up with no feedback, direct force feedback and substituted vibration feedback. Objective performance was the same in all conditions as was the learning effect over three sessions, but participants had a clear preference for haptic feedback over no haptic feedback. The preferred type of feedback (force or vibration or both) varied over participants. In general, this study showed that haptic feedback is preferred in teleoperation, the Box & Blocks task seems not sensitive enough for our (and most) current teleoperation set-up(s), and vibration feedback as substitute for direct force feedback works well and can be used intuitively.",

keywords = "Dexterous manipulation, Haptic feedback, Teleoperation",

author = "Kuling, {Irene A.} and Kaj Gijsbertse and Krom, {Bouke N.} and {van Teeffelen}, {Kees J.} and {van Erp}, {Jan B.F.}",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-58146-6",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "96--104",

editor = "Ilana Nisky and Jess Hartcher-O{\textquoteright}Brien and Micha{\"e}l Wiertlewski and Jeroen Smeets",

booktitle = "Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications",

address = "Germany",

note = "12th International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications, EuroHaptics 2020, EuroHaptics 2020 ; Conference date: 06-09-2020 Through 09-09-2020",

}

Kuling, IA, Gijsbertse, K, Krom, BN, van Teeffelen, KJ & van Erp, JBF 2020, Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task. in I Nisky, J Hartcher-O’Brien, M Wiertlewski & J Smeets (uitgave), Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications: 12th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2020, Leiden, The Netherlands, September 6–9, 2020, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 12272, Springer, Cham, blz. 96-104, EuroHaptics, Leiden, Nederland, 6/09/20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task. / Kuling, Irene A.; Gijsbertse, Kaj; Krom, Bouke N. et al.
Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications: 12th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2020, Leiden, The Netherlands, September 6–9, 2020, Proceedings. uitgave / Ilana Nisky; Jess Hartcher-O’Brien; Michaël Wiertlewski; Jeroen Smeets. Cham: Springer, 2020. blz. 96-104 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS); Vol. 12272).

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/Congresprocedure › Conferentiebijdrage › Academic › peer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task

AU - Kuling, Irene A.

AU - Gijsbertse, Kaj

AU - Krom, Bouke N.

AU - van Teeffelen, Kees J.

AU - van Erp, Jan B.F.

N1 - Conference code: 12

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Haptic feedback is a desired feature in teleoperation as it can improve dexterous manipulation. Direct force feedback to the operator’s hand and fingers requires complex hardware and therefore substituting force by for instance vibration is a relevant topic. In this experiment, we tested performance on a Box & Blocks task in a teleoperation set-up with no feedback, direct force feedback and substituted vibration feedback. Objective performance was the same in all conditions as was the learning effect over three sessions, but participants had a clear preference for haptic feedback over no haptic feedback. The preferred type of feedback (force or vibration or both) varied over participants. In general, this study showed that haptic feedback is preferred in teleoperation, the Box & Blocks task seems not sensitive enough for our (and most) current teleoperation set-up(s), and vibration feedback as substitute for direct force feedback works well and can be used intuitively.

AB - Haptic feedback is a desired feature in teleoperation as it can improve dexterous manipulation. Direct force feedback to the operator’s hand and fingers requires complex hardware and therefore substituting force by for instance vibration is a relevant topic. In this experiment, we tested performance on a Box & Blocks task in a teleoperation set-up with no feedback, direct force feedback and substituted vibration feedback. Objective performance was the same in all conditions as was the learning effect over three sessions, but participants had a clear preference for haptic feedback over no haptic feedback. The preferred type of feedback (force or vibration or both) varied over participants. In general, this study showed that haptic feedback is preferred in teleoperation, the Box & Blocks task seems not sensitive enough for our (and most) current teleoperation set-up(s), and vibration feedback as substitute for direct force feedback works well and can be used intuitively.

KW - Dexterous manipulation

KW - Haptic feedback

KW - Teleoperation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091297415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-3-030-58146-6

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)

SP - 96

EP - 104

BT - Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications

A2 - Nisky, Ilana

A2 - Hartcher-O’Brien, Jess

A2 - Wiertlewski, Michaël

A2 - Smeets, Jeroen

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

T2 - 12th International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications, EuroHaptics 2020

Y2 - 6 September 2020 through 9 September 2020

ER -

Kuling IA, Gijsbertse K, Krom BN, van Teeffelen KJ, van Erp JBF. Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task. In Nisky I, Hartcher-O’Brien J, Wiertlewski M, Smeets J, redacteurs, Haptics: Science, Technology, Applications: 12th International Conference, EuroHaptics 2020, Leiden, The Netherlands, September 6–9, 2020, Proceedings. Cham: Springer. 2020. blz. 96-104. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58147-3_11

Haptic feedback in a teleoperated box & blocks task

Samenvatting

Publicatie series

Congres

Toegang tot document

Andere bestanden en links

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit