Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity : standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine

Marc Berg, K. Horstman, S. Plas, M. van Heusden

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

75 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Does the increasing importance of guidelines in health care threaten the professional status of health care professions by reducing their professional autonomy? Or does it increase their position through enhancing their scientific status? In this paper, we focus on this apparent contradiction by studying how Dutch insurance physicians created and used guidelines for the evaluation of labour disability claims. Drawing upon the theoretical repertoire of science and technology studies, we studied the role of the notion of 'objectivity' in these developments. A specific redefinition of objectivity played a core role in the active alignment, by the insurance physicians' profession, of the processes of guideline development and professionalisation. Simultaneously, it is argued, a specific conceptualisation of the position of the client was put to the fore. Guidelines, it seems, can be drawn upon creatively so that rather than embodying a potential constant threat to professional autonomy, they actually enforce it.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)765-791
Aantal pagina's27
TijdschriftSociology of Health & Illness
Volume22
Nummer van het tijdschrift6
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2000

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity : standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit