Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest

L.M. Rose, M. Herrmannsdoerfer, S. Mazanek, P.M.E. Van Gorp, S. Buchwald, T. Horn, E. Kalnina, A. Koch, K. Lano, B. Schätz, M. Wimmer

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

33 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

We describe the results of the Transformation Tool Contest 2010 workshop, in which nine graph and model transformation tools were compared for specifying model migration. The model migration problem—migration of UML activity diagrams from version 1.4 to version 2.2—is non-trivial and practically relevant. The solutions have been compared with respect to several criteria: correctness, conciseness, understandability, appropriateness, maturity and support for extensions to the core migration task. We describe in detail the comparison method, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions with a special focus on the differences between graph and model transformation for model migration. The comparison results demonstrate.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)323-359
Aantal pagina's36
TijdschriftSoftware and Systems Modeling
Volume13
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2014

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Graph and model transformation tools for model migration : empirical results from the transformation tool contest'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit