TY - JOUR
T1 - Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndrome
T2 - impact on morbidity and mortality
AU - Buckley, Benjamin J.R.
AU - de Koning, Iris A.
AU - Harrison, Stephanie L.
AU - Fazio-Eynullayeva, Elnara
AU - Underhill, Paula
AU - Kemps, Hareld M.C.
AU - Lip, Gregory Y.H.
AU - Thijssen, Dick H.J.
N1 - Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
PY - 2022/5/25
Y1 - 2022/5/25
N2 - AIMS: Accumulating evidence questions the clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We therefore compare the impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) vs. PCI in patients with CCS on 18-month mortality and morbidity, and evaluate the effects of combining PCI with exercise-based CR.METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in March 2021. An online, real-world dataset of CCS patients was acquired, utilizing TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Patients with CCS who received PCI were first compared with patients who were prescribed exercise-based CR. Second, we compared patients who received both CR + PCI vs. CR alone. For both comparisons, patients were propensity-score matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and procedures. We ascertained 18-month incidence of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular comorbidity [stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and new-onset heart failure]. The initial cohort consisted of 18 383 CCS patients. Following propensity score matching, exercise-based CR was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality [0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.47)], rehospitalization [0.29 (95% CI: 0.27-0.32)], and cardiovascular morbidities, compared to PCI. Subsequently, patients that received both CR + PCI did not have significantly different odds for all-cause mortality [1.00 (95% CI: 0.63-1.60)], rehospitalization [1.00 (95% CI: 0.82-1.23)], AMI [1.11 (95% CI: 0.68-1.81)], and stroke [0.71 (95% CI: 0.39-1.31)], compared to CR only.CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PCI, exercise-based CR associated with significantly lower odds of 18-month all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with CCS, whilst combining PCI and exercise-based CR associated with lower incident heart failure only.
AB - AIMS: Accumulating evidence questions the clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We therefore compare the impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) vs. PCI in patients with CCS on 18-month mortality and morbidity, and evaluate the effects of combining PCI with exercise-based CR.METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in March 2021. An online, real-world dataset of CCS patients was acquired, utilizing TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Patients with CCS who received PCI were first compared with patients who were prescribed exercise-based CR. Second, we compared patients who received both CR + PCI vs. CR alone. For both comparisons, patients were propensity-score matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and procedures. We ascertained 18-month incidence of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular comorbidity [stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and new-onset heart failure]. The initial cohort consisted of 18 383 CCS patients. Following propensity score matching, exercise-based CR was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality [0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.47)], rehospitalization [0.29 (95% CI: 0.27-0.32)], and cardiovascular morbidities, compared to PCI. Subsequently, patients that received both CR + PCI did not have significantly different odds for all-cause mortality [1.00 (95% CI: 0.63-1.60)], rehospitalization [1.00 (95% CI: 0.82-1.23)], AMI [1.11 (95% CI: 0.68-1.81)], and stroke [0.71 (95% CI: 0.39-1.31)], compared to CR only.CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PCI, exercise-based CR associated with significantly lower odds of 18-month all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with CCS, whilst combining PCI and exercise-based CR associated with lower incident heart failure only.
KW - Cardiac Rehabilitation/adverse effects
KW - Heart Failure/complications
KW - Humans
KW - Incidence
KW - Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology
KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Stroke
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Angina
KW - Chronic coronary syndrome
KW - Exercise
KW - Cardiac rehabilitation
KW - Secondary prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131095920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab191
DO - 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab191
M3 - Article
C2 - 34788451
SN - 2047-4873
VL - 29
SP - 1074
EP - 1080
JO - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
JF - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
IS - 7
ER -