Environmental analysis of concrete deep foundations: Influence of prefabrication, concrete strength, and design codes

Ester Pujadas-Gispert (Corresponding author), David Sanjuan-Delmás, Albert de la Fuente, S.P.G. (Faas) Moonen, Alejandro Josa

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

Uittreksel

There is great potential to reduce the environmental impact of the building sector, which is now an area of immense importance, through the optimisation of construction materials and components. This study assesses both the design and the construction of Concrete Deep Foundations (CDFs), which are widely used in construction, from an environmental perspective considering the following variables: (i) grade of prefabrication, i.e., fully cast in situ, partly prefabricated, and fully prefabricated; (ii) compressive strength of cast-in-situ concrete; and (iii) building design codes, i.e., current Spanish codes (EHE-08 and CTE), Eurocode with the Spanish annexes, and Eurocode with the United Kingdom annexes. In addition, the results of Dynamic Load Tests (DLTs) and the economic cost of several CDFs are evaluated. Geotechnical and structural designs of CDFs are carried out along with their life-cycle assessment. Some of the main findings include: (i) partially and fully prefabricated CDFs and conducting DLTs reduced the environmental impact in most categories (by up to 44% for global warming emissions) compared to the fully cast-in-situ CDFs, although they were 12–37% more expensive; (ii) changing the compressive strength of the concrete (in piles and cap) in fully cast-in-situ CDFs from 25 to 35 MPa reduced the environmental impact by up to 14–17% in all categories and economic costs by up to 12%; and, (iii) CDFs with bored piles resulted in the lowest environmental burden when designed with Eurocode and UK annexes (11–31% less impact), as did CDFs with driven piles designed with current Spanish codes (11–18% less impact). The study variables and sensitivity analysis showed a significant effect on the results and should be considered in future construction, research, and building codes.

Originele taal-2Engels
Artikelnummer118751
Aantal pagina's11
TijdschriftJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume244
Vroegere onlinedatum13 okt 2019
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 20 jan 2020

Vingerafdruk

Concretes
Cast in place concrete
Piles
Environmental impact
Dynamic loads
pile
environmental impact
Compressive strength
compressive strength
Economics
Precast concrete
Environmental analysis
code
environmental analysis
Global warming
Structural design
architectural design
Sensitivity analysis
Costs
Life cycle

Citeer dit

@article{1433fac95dfc486ba33717ff6efa42a0,
title = "Environmental analysis of concrete deep foundations: Influence of prefabrication, concrete strength, and design codes",
abstract = "There is great potential to reduce the environmental impact of the building sector, which is now an area of immense importance, through the optimisation of construction materials and components. This study assesses both the design and the construction of Concrete Deep Foundations (CDFs), which are widely used in construction, from an environmental perspective considering the following variables: (i) grade of prefabrication, i.e., fully cast in situ, partly prefabricated, and fully prefabricated; (ii) compressive strength of cast-in-situ concrete; and (iii) building design codes, i.e., current Spanish codes (EHE-08 and CTE), Eurocode with the Spanish annexes, and Eurocode with the United Kingdom annexes. In addition, the results of Dynamic Load Tests (DLTs) and the economic cost of several CDFs are evaluated. Geotechnical and structural designs of CDFs are carried out along with their life-cycle assessment. Some of the main findings include: (i) partially and fully prefabricated CDFs and conducting DLTs reduced the environmental impact in most categories (by up to 44{\%} for global warming emissions) compared to the fully cast-in-situ CDFs, although they were 12–37{\%} more expensive; (ii) changing the compressive strength of the concrete (in piles and cap) in fully cast-in-situ CDFs from 25 to 35 MPa reduced the environmental impact by up to 14–17{\%} in all categories and economic costs by up to 12{\%}; and, (iii) CDFs with bored piles resulted in the lowest environmental burden when designed with Eurocode and UK annexes (11–31{\%} less impact), as did CDFs with driven piles designed with current Spanish codes (11–18{\%} less impact). The study variables and sensitivity analysis showed a significant effect on the results and should be considered in future construction, research, and building codes.",
keywords = "CTE, Economic, EHE-08, Eurocode, LCA, Pile",
author = "Ester Pujadas-Gispert and David Sanjuan-Delm{\'a}s and {de la Fuente}, Albert and Moonen, {S.P.G. (Faas)} and Alejandro Josa",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118751",
language = "English",
volume = "244",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Environmental analysis of concrete deep foundations : Influence of prefabrication, concrete strength, and design codes. / Pujadas-Gispert, Ester (Corresponding author); Sanjuan-Delmás, David; de la Fuente, Albert; Moonen, S.P.G. (Faas); Josa, Alejandro.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 244, 118751, 20.01.2020.

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental analysis of concrete deep foundations

T2 - Influence of prefabrication, concrete strength, and design codes

AU - Pujadas-Gispert, Ester

AU - Sanjuan-Delmás, David

AU - de la Fuente, Albert

AU - Moonen, S.P.G. (Faas)

AU - Josa, Alejandro

PY - 2020/1/20

Y1 - 2020/1/20

N2 - There is great potential to reduce the environmental impact of the building sector, which is now an area of immense importance, through the optimisation of construction materials and components. This study assesses both the design and the construction of Concrete Deep Foundations (CDFs), which are widely used in construction, from an environmental perspective considering the following variables: (i) grade of prefabrication, i.e., fully cast in situ, partly prefabricated, and fully prefabricated; (ii) compressive strength of cast-in-situ concrete; and (iii) building design codes, i.e., current Spanish codes (EHE-08 and CTE), Eurocode with the Spanish annexes, and Eurocode with the United Kingdom annexes. In addition, the results of Dynamic Load Tests (DLTs) and the economic cost of several CDFs are evaluated. Geotechnical and structural designs of CDFs are carried out along with their life-cycle assessment. Some of the main findings include: (i) partially and fully prefabricated CDFs and conducting DLTs reduced the environmental impact in most categories (by up to 44% for global warming emissions) compared to the fully cast-in-situ CDFs, although they were 12–37% more expensive; (ii) changing the compressive strength of the concrete (in piles and cap) in fully cast-in-situ CDFs from 25 to 35 MPa reduced the environmental impact by up to 14–17% in all categories and economic costs by up to 12%; and, (iii) CDFs with bored piles resulted in the lowest environmental burden when designed with Eurocode and UK annexes (11–31% less impact), as did CDFs with driven piles designed with current Spanish codes (11–18% less impact). The study variables and sensitivity analysis showed a significant effect on the results and should be considered in future construction, research, and building codes.

AB - There is great potential to reduce the environmental impact of the building sector, which is now an area of immense importance, through the optimisation of construction materials and components. This study assesses both the design and the construction of Concrete Deep Foundations (CDFs), which are widely used in construction, from an environmental perspective considering the following variables: (i) grade of prefabrication, i.e., fully cast in situ, partly prefabricated, and fully prefabricated; (ii) compressive strength of cast-in-situ concrete; and (iii) building design codes, i.e., current Spanish codes (EHE-08 and CTE), Eurocode with the Spanish annexes, and Eurocode with the United Kingdom annexes. In addition, the results of Dynamic Load Tests (DLTs) and the economic cost of several CDFs are evaluated. Geotechnical and structural designs of CDFs are carried out along with their life-cycle assessment. Some of the main findings include: (i) partially and fully prefabricated CDFs and conducting DLTs reduced the environmental impact in most categories (by up to 44% for global warming emissions) compared to the fully cast-in-situ CDFs, although they were 12–37% more expensive; (ii) changing the compressive strength of the concrete (in piles and cap) in fully cast-in-situ CDFs from 25 to 35 MPa reduced the environmental impact by up to 14–17% in all categories and economic costs by up to 12%; and, (iii) CDFs with bored piles resulted in the lowest environmental burden when designed with Eurocode and UK annexes (11–31% less impact), as did CDFs with driven piles designed with current Spanish codes (11–18% less impact). The study variables and sensitivity analysis showed a significant effect on the results and should be considered in future construction, research, and building codes.

KW - CTE

KW - Economic

KW - EHE-08

KW - Eurocode

KW - LCA

KW - Pile

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074344623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118751

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118751

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074344623

VL - 244

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

M1 - 118751

ER -