Echocardiographic assessment of left bundle branch–related strain dyssynchrony: a comparison with tagged MRI

Louis S. Fixsen (Corresponding author), Anouk G.W. de Lepper, Marc Strik, Lars B. van Middendorp, Frits W. Prinzen, Frans N. van de Vosse, Patrick Houthuizen, Richard G.P. Lopata

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

Uittreksel

Recent studies have shown the efficacy of myocardial strain estimated using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in predicting response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This study focuses on circumferential strain patterns, comparing STE-acquired strains to tagged-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-T). Second, the effect of regularisation was examined. Two-dimensional parasternal ultrasound (US) and MRI-T data were acquired in the left ventricular short-axis view of canines before (n = 8) and after (n = 9) left bunch branch block (LBBB) induction. US-based strain analysis was performed on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data at the mid-level using three overall methods (“Commercial software,” “Basic block-matching,” “regularised block-matching”). Moreover, three regularisation approaches were implemented and compared. MRI-T analysis was performed using SinMod. Normalised regional circumferential strain curves, based on standard six or septal/lateral segments, were analysed and cross-correlated with MRI-T data. Systolic strain (SS) and septal rebound stretch (SRS) were calculated and compared. Overall agreement of normalised circumferential strain was good between all methods on a global and regional level. All STE methods showed a bias (≥4% strain) toward higher SS estimates. Pre-LBBB, septal and lateral segment correlation was excellent between the Basic (mean ρ = 0.96) and regularised (mean ρ = 0.97) methods and MRI-T. The Commercial method showed a significant discrepancy between the two walls (septal ρ = 0.94, lateral ρ = 0.68). Correlation with MRI-T reduced between pre- and post-LBBB (Commercial ρ = 0.79, Basic ρ = 0.82, mean regularised ρ = 0.86). Septal strain patterns and SRS varied with the STE software and type of regularisation, with all STE methods estimating non-zero SRS values pre-LBBB. Absolute values showed moderate agreement, with a bias for higher strain from STE. SRS varied with the type of software and extra regularisation applied. Open efforts are needed to understand the underlying causes of differences between STE methods before standardisation can be achieved. This is particularly important given the apparent clinical value of strain-based parameters such as SRS.

TaalEngels
Pagina's2063-2074
TijdschriftUltrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume45
Nummer van het tijdschrift8
Vroegere onlinedatum3 mei 2019
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 aug 2019

Vingerafdruk

echocardiography
bundles
Echocardiography
Software
computer programs
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
speckle patterns
standardization
medicine
magnetic resonance
Canidae
therapy
induction
estimating
communication
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medicine
causes
curves
estimates

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    Fixsen, Louis S. ; de Lepper, Anouk G.W. ; Strik, Marc ; van Middendorp, Lars B. ; Prinzen, Frits W. ; van de Vosse, Frans N. ; Houthuizen, Patrick ; Lopata, Richard G.P./ Echocardiographic assessment of left bundle branch–related strain dyssynchrony : a comparison with tagged MRI. In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 45, Nr. 8. blz. 2063-2074
    @article{49e3e2025c6447c5ad18d169b9fef206,
    title = "Echocardiographic assessment of left bundle branch–related strain dyssynchrony: a comparison with tagged MRI",
    abstract = "Recent studies have shown the efficacy of myocardial strain estimated using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in predicting response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This study focuses on circumferential strain patterns, comparing STE-acquired strains to tagged-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-T). Second, the effect of regularisation was examined. Two-dimensional parasternal ultrasound (US) and MRI-T data were acquired in the left ventricular short-axis view of canines before (n = 8) and after (n = 9) left bunch branch block (LBBB) induction. US-based strain analysis was performed on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data at the mid-level using three overall methods (“Commercial software,” “Basic block-matching,” “regularised block-matching”). Moreover, three regularisation approaches were implemented and compared. MRI-T analysis was performed using SinMod. Normalised regional circumferential strain curves, based on standard six or septal/lateral segments, were analysed and cross-correlated with MRI-T data. Systolic strain (SS) and septal rebound stretch (SRS) were calculated and compared. Overall agreement of normalised circumferential strain was good between all methods on a global and regional level. All STE methods showed a bias (≥4{\%} strain) toward higher SS estimates. Pre-LBBB, septal and lateral segment correlation was excellent between the Basic (mean ρ = 0.96) and regularised (mean ρ = 0.97) methods and MRI-T. The Commercial method showed a significant discrepancy between the two walls (septal ρ = 0.94, lateral ρ = 0.68). Correlation with MRI-T reduced between pre- and post-LBBB (Commercial ρ = 0.79, Basic ρ = 0.82, mean regularised ρ = 0.86). Septal strain patterns and SRS varied with the STE software and type of regularisation, with all STE methods estimating non-zero SRS values pre-LBBB. Absolute values showed moderate agreement, with a bias for higher strain from STE. SRS varied with the type of software and extra regularisation applied. Open efforts are needed to understand the underlying causes of differences between STE methods before standardisation can be achieved. This is particularly important given the apparent clinical value of strain-based parameters such as SRS.",
    keywords = "Dyssynchrony, Echocardiography, LBBB, Regularisation, Speckle tracking",
    author = "Fixsen, {Louis S.} and {de Lepper}, {Anouk G.W.} and Marc Strik and {van Middendorp}, {Lars B.} and Prinzen, {Frits W.} and {van de Vosse}, {Frans N.} and Patrick Houthuizen and Lopata, {Richard G.P.}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "2063--2074",
    journal = "Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology",
    issn = "0301-5629",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "8",

    }

    Echocardiographic assessment of left bundle branch–related strain dyssynchrony : a comparison with tagged MRI. / Fixsen, Louis S. (Corresponding author); de Lepper, Anouk G.W.; Strik, Marc; van Middendorp, Lars B.; Prinzen, Frits W.; van de Vosse, Frans N.; Houthuizen, Patrick; Lopata, Richard G.P.

    In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 45, Nr. 8, 01.08.2019, blz. 2063-2074.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Echocardiographic assessment of left bundle branch–related strain dyssynchrony

    T2 - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

    AU - Fixsen,Louis S.

    AU - de Lepper,Anouk G.W.

    AU - Strik,Marc

    AU - van Middendorp,Lars B.

    AU - Prinzen,Frits W.

    AU - van de Vosse,Frans N.

    AU - Houthuizen,Patrick

    AU - Lopata,Richard G.P.

    PY - 2019/8/1

    Y1 - 2019/8/1

    N2 - Recent studies have shown the efficacy of myocardial strain estimated using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in predicting response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This study focuses on circumferential strain patterns, comparing STE-acquired strains to tagged-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-T). Second, the effect of regularisation was examined. Two-dimensional parasternal ultrasound (US) and MRI-T data were acquired in the left ventricular short-axis view of canines before (n = 8) and after (n = 9) left bunch branch block (LBBB) induction. US-based strain analysis was performed on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data at the mid-level using three overall methods (“Commercial software,” “Basic block-matching,” “regularised block-matching”). Moreover, three regularisation approaches were implemented and compared. MRI-T analysis was performed using SinMod. Normalised regional circumferential strain curves, based on standard six or septal/lateral segments, were analysed and cross-correlated with MRI-T data. Systolic strain (SS) and septal rebound stretch (SRS) were calculated and compared. Overall agreement of normalised circumferential strain was good between all methods on a global and regional level. All STE methods showed a bias (≥4% strain) toward higher SS estimates. Pre-LBBB, septal and lateral segment correlation was excellent between the Basic (mean ρ = 0.96) and regularised (mean ρ = 0.97) methods and MRI-T. The Commercial method showed a significant discrepancy between the two walls (septal ρ = 0.94, lateral ρ = 0.68). Correlation with MRI-T reduced between pre- and post-LBBB (Commercial ρ = 0.79, Basic ρ = 0.82, mean regularised ρ = 0.86). Septal strain patterns and SRS varied with the STE software and type of regularisation, with all STE methods estimating non-zero SRS values pre-LBBB. Absolute values showed moderate agreement, with a bias for higher strain from STE. SRS varied with the type of software and extra regularisation applied. Open efforts are needed to understand the underlying causes of differences between STE methods before standardisation can be achieved. This is particularly important given the apparent clinical value of strain-based parameters such as SRS.

    AB - Recent studies have shown the efficacy of myocardial strain estimated using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in predicting response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This study focuses on circumferential strain patterns, comparing STE-acquired strains to tagged-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-T). Second, the effect of regularisation was examined. Two-dimensional parasternal ultrasound (US) and MRI-T data were acquired in the left ventricular short-axis view of canines before (n = 8) and after (n = 9) left bunch branch block (LBBB) induction. US-based strain analysis was performed on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data at the mid-level using three overall methods (“Commercial software,” “Basic block-matching,” “regularised block-matching”). Moreover, three regularisation approaches were implemented and compared. MRI-T analysis was performed using SinMod. Normalised regional circumferential strain curves, based on standard six or septal/lateral segments, were analysed and cross-correlated with MRI-T data. Systolic strain (SS) and septal rebound stretch (SRS) were calculated and compared. Overall agreement of normalised circumferential strain was good between all methods on a global and regional level. All STE methods showed a bias (≥4% strain) toward higher SS estimates. Pre-LBBB, septal and lateral segment correlation was excellent between the Basic (mean ρ = 0.96) and regularised (mean ρ = 0.97) methods and MRI-T. The Commercial method showed a significant discrepancy between the two walls (septal ρ = 0.94, lateral ρ = 0.68). Correlation with MRI-T reduced between pre- and post-LBBB (Commercial ρ = 0.79, Basic ρ = 0.82, mean regularised ρ = 0.86). Septal strain patterns and SRS varied with the STE software and type of regularisation, with all STE methods estimating non-zero SRS values pre-LBBB. Absolute values showed moderate agreement, with a bias for higher strain from STE. SRS varied with the type of software and extra regularisation applied. Open efforts are needed to understand the underlying causes of differences between STE methods before standardisation can be achieved. This is particularly important given the apparent clinical value of strain-based parameters such as SRS.

    KW - Dyssynchrony

    KW - Echocardiography

    KW - LBBB

    KW - Regularisation

    KW - Speckle tracking

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064912138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.012

    DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.03.012

    M3 - Article

    VL - 45

    SP - 2063

    EP - 2074

    JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

    JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

    SN - 0301-5629

    IS - 8

    ER -