Samenvatting
This paper tests for traces of discrimination against foreign firms in the patent prosecution process. It focuses on the case of China and looks specifically at patent applications declared as essential to a technological standard. The choice of standard-essential patents (SEPs) is particularly suited because of the ‘strategic’ importance of such patents for China’s indigenous innovation program. We exploit information on the timing of disclosure as SEP (before or after the patent application enters examination) to infer the likely presence of discrimination. We find that patent applications by foreign firms are treated unfavorably when examiners know that they are declared as standard essential. We interpret this result as a case of technology protectionism.
Originele taal-2 | Engels |
---|---|
Pagina's | 1-25 |
Aantal pagina's | 25 |
Status | Gepubliceerd - jun. 2017 |
Evenement | DRUID 2017, June 12-14, 2017, New York City - Stern School of Busines, New York University, New York City, Verenigde Staten van Amerika Duur: 12 jun. 2017 → 14 jun. 2017 https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=23 |
Congres
Congres | DRUID 2017, June 12-14, 2017, New York City |
---|---|
Verkorte titel | DRUID 2017 |
Land/Regio | Verenigde Staten van Amerika |
Stad | New York City |
Periode | 12/06/17 → 14/06/17 |
Internet adres |