Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function

E.A.D. Carbone; S. Hübner; E.I. Iordanova; N. Vries, de; M. Jimenez Diaz; J.M. Palomares Linares; J.J.A.M. Mullen, van der

Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function

E.A.D. Carbone
, S. Hübner
, E.I. Iordanova
, N. Vries, de
, M. Jimenez Diaz
, J.M. Palomares Linares
, J.J.A.M. Mullen, van der

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/Congresprocedure › Conferentiebijdrage › Academic › peer review

72 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

A large panel of diagnostic techniques for the determination of effective electron temperatures Te exists and they rely on different hypothesis/physical phenomena for its measurement. Due to the different underlying assumptions and physical mechanisms used for the calculation of Te, different values of Te may be expected while measuring a plasma in the same conditions, particularly in the case of a non-Maxwellian plasma. To each of these definitions of effective Te, a different effective Te can be defined using the EEDF of the plasma. In this study, we take a low pressure Argon microwave plasma as test case and compare Thomson scattering with line intensity measurements corrected by a collisional radiative model. The results are compared with those obtained from the electron particle balance (ePB).

Originele taal-2	Engels
Titel	Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
Pagina's	1-2
Status	Gepubliceerd - 2012
Evenement	21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), July 10-14, 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal - Viana do Castelo, Portugal Duur: 10 jul. 2012 → 14 jul. 2012

Congres

Congres	21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), July 10-14, 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
Verkorte titel	ESCAMPIG XXI
Land/Regio	Portugal
Stad	Viana do Castelo
Periode	10/07/12 → 14/07/12
Ander	21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI)

Toegang tot document

publishers versionDefinitieve gepubliceerde versie, 144 KB

Citeer dit

Carbone, E. A. D., Hübner, S., Iordanova, E. I., Vries, de, N., Jimenez Diaz, M., Palomares Linares, J. M., & Mullen, van der, J. J. A. M. (2012). Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function. In Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal (blz. 1-2)

@inproceedings{4db3af09c8d44849987fe1832a8075b9,

title = "Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function",

abstract = "A large panel of diagnostic techniques for the determination of effective electron temperatures Te exists and they rely on different hypothesis/physical phenomena for its measurement. Due to the different underlying assumptions and physical mechanisms used for the calculation of Te, different values of Te may be expected while measuring a plasma in the same conditions, particularly in the case of a non-Maxwellian plasma. To each of these definitions of effective Te, a different effective Te can be defined using the EEDF of the plasma. In this study, we take a low pressure Argon microwave plasma as test case and compare Thomson scattering with line intensity measurements corrected by a collisional radiative model. The results are compared with those obtained from the electron particle balance (ePB).",

author = "E.A.D. Carbone and S. H{\"u}bner and E.I. Iordanova and \{Vries, de\}, N. and \{Jimenez Diaz\}, M. and \{Palomares Linares\}, J.M. and \{Mullen, van der\}, J.J.A.M.",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

pages = "1--2",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal",

note = "21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), July 10-14, 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal, ESCAMPIG XXI ; Conference date: 10-07-2012 Through 14-07-2012",

}

Carbone, EAD, Hübner, S, Iordanova, EI, Vries, de, N, Jimenez Diaz, M, Palomares Linares, JM & Mullen, van der, JJAM 2012, Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function. in Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal. blz. 1-2, 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), July 10-14, 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal, Viana do Castelo, Portugal, 10/07/12.

Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function. / Carbone, E.A.D.; Hübner, S.; Iordanova, E.I. et al.
Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal. 2012. blz. 1-2.

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/Congresprocedure › Conferentiebijdrage › Academic › peer review

TY - GEN

T1 - Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function

AU - Carbone, E.A.D.

AU - Hübner, S.

AU - Iordanova, E.I.

AU - Vries, de, N.

AU - Jimenez Diaz, M.

AU - Palomares Linares, J.M.

AU - Mullen, van der, J.J.A.M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A large panel of diagnostic techniques for the determination of effective electron temperatures Te exists and they rely on different hypothesis/physical phenomena for its measurement. Due to the different underlying assumptions and physical mechanisms used for the calculation of Te, different values of Te may be expected while measuring a plasma in the same conditions, particularly in the case of a non-Maxwellian plasma. To each of these definitions of effective Te, a different effective Te can be defined using the EEDF of the plasma. In this study, we take a low pressure Argon microwave plasma as test case and compare Thomson scattering with line intensity measurements corrected by a collisional radiative model. The results are compared with those obtained from the electron particle balance (ePB).

AB - A large panel of diagnostic techniques for the determination of effective electron temperatures Te exists and they rely on different hypothesis/physical phenomena for its measurement. Due to the different underlying assumptions and physical mechanisms used for the calculation of Te, different values of Te may be expected while measuring a plasma in the same conditions, particularly in the case of a non-Maxwellian plasma. To each of these definitions of effective Te, a different effective Te can be defined using the EEDF of the plasma. In this study, we take a low pressure Argon microwave plasma as test case and compare Thomson scattering with line intensity measurements corrected by a collisional radiative model. The results are compared with those obtained from the electron particle balance (ePB).

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 2

BT - Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal

T2 - 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), July 10-14, 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal

Y2 - 10 July 2012 through 14 July 2012

ER -

Carbone EAD, Hübner S, Iordanova EI, Vries, de N, Jimenez Diaz M, Palomares Linares JM et al. Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function. In Proceedings of the 21st Europhysics Conference on the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Ionized Gases (ESCAMPIG XXI), 10-14 July 2012, Viana do Castelo, Portugal. 2012. blz. 1-2

Discrepancies between different electron temperature methods: probing the electron energy distribution function

Samenvatting

Congres

Toegang tot document

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit