Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

14 Citaties (Scopus)

Uittreksel

One of the topics that often comes up in ethical discussions of deep brain stimulation (DBS), is the question of what impact DBS has, or might have, on the patient’s self. This is often understood as a question of whether DBS poses a “threat” to personal identity, which is typically understood as having to do with psychological and/or narrative continuity over time. In this article, we argue that the discussion of whether DBS is a “threat” to continuity over time is too narrow. There are other questions concerning DBS and the self that are overlooked in discussions exclusively focusing on psychological and/or narrative continuity. For example, it is also important to investigate whether DBS might sometimes have a positive (e.g. a rehabilitating) effect on the patient’s self. To widen the discussion of DBS, so as to make it encompass a broader range of considerations that bear on DBS’s impact on the self, we identify six features of the commonly used concept of a person’s “true self”. We apply these six features to the relation between DBS and the self. And we end with a brief discussion of the role DBS might play in treating otherwise treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa. This further highlights the importance of discussing both continuity over time and the notion of the true self
TaalEngels
Pagina's647-658
Aantal pagina's12
TijdschriftCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume25
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 16 sep 2016

Vingerafdruk

Deep Brain Stimulation
brain
continuity
time
threat
Psychology
narrative
anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    @article{a4ca2426f52e42299566b3ee780fab45,
    title = "Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self",
    abstract = "One of the topics that often comes up in ethical discussions of deep brain stimulation (DBS), is the question of what impact DBS has, or might have, on the patient’s self. This is often understood as a question of whether DBS poses a “threat” to personal identity, which is typically understood as having to do with psychological and/or narrative continuity over time. In this article, we argue that the discussion of whether DBS is a “threat” to continuity over time is too narrow. There are other questions concerning DBS and the self that are overlooked in discussions exclusively focusing on psychological and/or narrative continuity. For example, it is also important to investigate whether DBS might sometimes have a positive (e.g. a rehabilitating) effect on the patient’s self. To widen the discussion of DBS, so as to make it encompass a broader range of considerations that bear on DBS’s impact on the self, we identify six features of the commonly used concept of a person’s “true self”. We apply these six features to the relation between DBS and the self. And we end with a brief discussion of the role DBS might play in treating otherwise treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa. This further highlights the importance of discussing both continuity over time and the notion of the true self",
    keywords = "deep brain stimulation, the self, the true self, ethics",
    author = "S.R. Nyholm and E.R.H. O'Neill",
    year = "2016",
    month = "9",
    day = "16",
    doi = "10.1017/S0963180116000372",
    language = "English",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "647--658",
    journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
    issn = "0963-1801",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self. / Nyholm, S.R.; O'Neill, E.R.H.

    In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 25, Nr. 4, 16.09.2016, blz. 647-658.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Deep brain stimulation, continuity over time, and the true self

    AU - Nyholm,S.R.

    AU - O'Neill,E.R.H.

    PY - 2016/9/16

    Y1 - 2016/9/16

    N2 - One of the topics that often comes up in ethical discussions of deep brain stimulation (DBS), is the question of what impact DBS has, or might have, on the patient’s self. This is often understood as a question of whether DBS poses a “threat” to personal identity, which is typically understood as having to do with psychological and/or narrative continuity over time. In this article, we argue that the discussion of whether DBS is a “threat” to continuity over time is too narrow. There are other questions concerning DBS and the self that are overlooked in discussions exclusively focusing on psychological and/or narrative continuity. For example, it is also important to investigate whether DBS might sometimes have a positive (e.g. a rehabilitating) effect on the patient’s self. To widen the discussion of DBS, so as to make it encompass a broader range of considerations that bear on DBS’s impact on the self, we identify six features of the commonly used concept of a person’s “true self”. We apply these six features to the relation between DBS and the self. And we end with a brief discussion of the role DBS might play in treating otherwise treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa. This further highlights the importance of discussing both continuity over time and the notion of the true self

    AB - One of the topics that often comes up in ethical discussions of deep brain stimulation (DBS), is the question of what impact DBS has, or might have, on the patient’s self. This is often understood as a question of whether DBS poses a “threat” to personal identity, which is typically understood as having to do with psychological and/or narrative continuity over time. In this article, we argue that the discussion of whether DBS is a “threat” to continuity over time is too narrow. There are other questions concerning DBS and the self that are overlooked in discussions exclusively focusing on psychological and/or narrative continuity. For example, it is also important to investigate whether DBS might sometimes have a positive (e.g. a rehabilitating) effect on the patient’s self. To widen the discussion of DBS, so as to make it encompass a broader range of considerations that bear on DBS’s impact on the self, we identify six features of the commonly used concept of a person’s “true self”. We apply these six features to the relation between DBS and the self. And we end with a brief discussion of the role DBS might play in treating otherwise treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa. This further highlights the importance of discussing both continuity over time and the notion of the true self

    KW - deep brain stimulation

    KW - the self

    KW - the true self

    KW - ethics

    U2 - 10.1017/S0963180116000372

    DO - 10.1017/S0963180116000372

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 647

    EP - 658

    JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

    T2 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

    JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

    SN - 0963-1801

    IS - 4

    ER -