TY - JOUR
T1 - Contactless Method to Estimate Antenna Efficiency in a Reverberation Chamber
AU - Galesloot, Esmé
AU - Hubrechsen, A.
AU - Bronckers, L.A.
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Measuring the efficiency of electrically small antennas (ESAs) and integrated antennas (IAs) is challenging, since for ESAs, the probe may significantly affect the results and for IAs, establishing a connection with the IA is in many cases not possible. Therefore, a contactless method to estimate the efficiency of ESAs and IAs is necessary. This article proposes a novel method to estimate antenna efficiency contactlessly using a reverberation chamber (RC): the contactless efficiency method (CEM). In the CEM, we combine the two-antenna method (TAM) with the contactless characterization method (CCM), to estimate the ${S}$ -parameters contactlessly. To validate the results, the CEM measurements are compared to the measurements of the widely used TAM and for both methods, an uncertainty analysis is performed. Results show a good agreement in the 95% confidence interval between the CEM and the existing connectorized method for both the total antenna efficiency and the radiation antenna efficiency. The uncertainty of the CEM with a 95% confidence level is below 6% for the whole 0.55-1.05-GHz frequency band.
AB - Measuring the efficiency of electrically small antennas (ESAs) and integrated antennas (IAs) is challenging, since for ESAs, the probe may significantly affect the results and for IAs, establishing a connection with the IA is in many cases not possible. Therefore, a contactless method to estimate the efficiency of ESAs and IAs is necessary. This article proposes a novel method to estimate antenna efficiency contactlessly using a reverberation chamber (RC): the contactless efficiency method (CEM). In the CEM, we combine the two-antenna method (TAM) with the contactless characterization method (CCM), to estimate the ${S}$ -parameters contactlessly. To validate the results, the CEM measurements are compared to the measurements of the widely used TAM and for both methods, an uncertainty analysis is performed. Results show a good agreement in the 95% confidence interval between the CEM and the existing connectorized method for both the total antenna efficiency and the radiation antenna efficiency. The uncertainty of the CEM with a 95% confidence level is below 6% for the whole 0.55-1.05-GHz frequency band.
KW - Antenna efficiency
KW - contactless characterization method
KW - contactless efficiency method
KW - reverberation chamber
KW - wireless testing
KW - contactless characterization method (CCM)
KW - contactless efficiency method (CEM)
KW - reverberation chamber (RC)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85149817455
U2 - 10.1109/TAP.2023.3253216
DO - 10.1109/TAP.2023.3253216
M3 - Article
SN - 0018-926X
VL - 71
SP - 3797
EP - 3805
JO - IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
JF - IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
IS - 5
ER -