TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the local front reconstruction method with a diffuse interface model for the modeling of droplet collisions
AU - Rajkotwala, Adnan
AU - Gelissen, Erwin
AU - Baltussen, Maike W.
AU - Peters, E.A.J.F. (Frank)
AU - van der Geld, Cees W.M.
AU - Kuerten, J.G.M. (Hans)
AU - Kuipers, J.A.M. (Hans)
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - In the present study the authors compare two different simulation models for the modeling of droplet collisions. The simulation models are: the Local Front Reconstruction Method (LFRM) and the Diffuse Interface Model (DIM). Results for fully three-dimensional simulations of droplet collisions at relatively high Weber number simulated with both models are presented and compared. Additionally, a detailed analysis of the dissipation and energy transfer processes of the collision is presented. An overall good agreement is seen in the collision outcomes. Some differences are observed in the interface evolution and the energy transfer/dissipation process during the droplet collision. A significant portion of these differences can be attributed to the differences in the configuration of the initial velocity field. Therefore, for the initial configuration a divergence-free vortical velocity field is introduced to achieve a better match between the simulation models. This improves the agreement of the simulation results.
AB - In the present study the authors compare two different simulation models for the modeling of droplet collisions. The simulation models are: the Local Front Reconstruction Method (LFRM) and the Diffuse Interface Model (DIM). Results for fully three-dimensional simulations of droplet collisions at relatively high Weber number simulated with both models are presented and compared. Additionally, a detailed analysis of the dissipation and energy transfer processes of the collision is presented. An overall good agreement is seen in the collision outcomes. Some differences are observed in the interface evolution and the energy transfer/dissipation process during the droplet collision. A significant portion of these differences can be attributed to the differences in the configuration of the initial velocity field. Therefore, for the initial configuration a divergence-free vortical velocity field is introduced to achieve a better match between the simulation models. This improves the agreement of the simulation results.
KW - Diffuse interface model
KW - Droplet collisions
KW - Front tracking
KW - Local front reconstruction method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084374770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cesx.2020.100066
DO - 10.1016/j.cesx.2020.100066
M3 - Article
SN - 2590-1400
VL - 7
SP - 14
JO - Chemical Engineering Science: X
JF - Chemical Engineering Science: X
M1 - 100066
ER -