TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing simulations and experiments of positive streamers in air
T2 - Steps toward model validation
AU - Li, Xiaoran
AU - Dijcks, Siebe
AU - Nijdam, Sander
AU - Sun, Anbang
AU - Ebert, Ute
AU - Teunissen, Jannis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - We compare simulations and experiments of single positive streamer discharges in air at 100 mbar, aiming toward model validation. Experimentally, streamers are generated in a plate-plate geometry with a protruding needle. We are able to capture the complete time evolution of reproducible single-filament streamers with a ns gate-time camera. A 2D axisymmetric drift-diffusion-reaction fluid model is used to simulate streamers under conditions closely matching those of the experiments. Streamer velocities, radii and light emission profiles are compared between model and experiment. Good qualitative agreement is observed between the experimental and simulated optical emission profiles, and for the streamer velocity and radius during the entire evolution. Quantitatively, the simulated streamer velocity is about 20% to 30% lower at the same streamer length, and the simulated radius is about 1 mm (20% to 30%) smaller. The effect of various parameters on the agreement between model and experiment is studied, such as the used transport data, the background ionization level, the photoionization rate, the gas temperature, the voltage rise time and the voltage boundary conditions. An increase in gas temperature due to the 50 Hz experimental repetition frequency could probably account for some of the observed discrepancies.
AB - We compare simulations and experiments of single positive streamer discharges in air at 100 mbar, aiming toward model validation. Experimentally, streamers are generated in a plate-plate geometry with a protruding needle. We are able to capture the complete time evolution of reproducible single-filament streamers with a ns gate-time camera. A 2D axisymmetric drift-diffusion-reaction fluid model is used to simulate streamers under conditions closely matching those of the experiments. Streamer velocities, radii and light emission profiles are compared between model and experiment. Good qualitative agreement is observed between the experimental and simulated optical emission profiles, and for the streamer velocity and radius during the entire evolution. Quantitatively, the simulated streamer velocity is about 20% to 30% lower at the same streamer length, and the simulated radius is about 1 mm (20% to 30%) smaller. The effect of various parameters on the agreement between model and experiment is studied, such as the used transport data, the background ionization level, the photoionization rate, the gas temperature, the voltage rise time and the voltage boundary conditions. An increase in gas temperature due to the 50 Hz experimental repetition frequency could probably account for some of the observed discrepancies.
KW - comparing simulations and experiments
KW - fluid simulations
KW - model validation
KW - reproducible single-filament streamer
KW - sensitivity analysis
KW - streamer discharge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115976359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6595/ac1b36
DO - 10.1088/1361-6595/ac1b36
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115976359
SN - 0963-0252
VL - 30
JO - Plasma Sources Science and Technology
JF - Plasma Sources Science and Technology
IS - 9
M1 - 095002
ER -