Commitment engineering: conceptual engineering without representations

Guido Löhr (Corresponding author)

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

Samenvatting

It is largely assumed that conceptual engineering is essentially about revising, introducing, or eliminating representational devices, in particular the intension and extension of words and concepts. However, tying conceptual engineering too closely to representations is risky. Not everyone endorses the notion of representation as theoretically helpful or even real. Not everyone thinks that concepts or meanings should be understood in terms of the notion of representation. Does this mean that conceptual engineering is not interesting or relevant for these skeptics? In this paper, I motivate and propose a non-representationalist construal of conceptual engineering. I argue that conceptual engineers can be understood as primarily engineering linguistic entitlements and commitments rather than representational devices. Note that this account is non-representationalist, but explicitly not anti-representationalist. Representations may play a significant role when it comes to justifying and completing commitment engineering projects.
Originele taal-2Engels
TijdschriftSynthese
VolumeXX
Nummer van het tijdschriftX
DOI's
StatusE-publicatie vóór gedrukte publicatie - 18 aug 2021

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Commitment engineering: conceptual engineering without representations'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit