Building Kidney Exchange Programmes in Europe: an overview of exchange practice and activities

Peter Biro (Corresponding author), Bernadette Haase-Kromwijk, Tommy Andersson, Eyolfur Ásgeirsson, Tatiana Baltesová, Ioannis Boletis, Catarina Bolotinha, Gregor Bond, Georg Böhmig, Lisa Burnapp, Katarína Cechlárová, Paolo Di Caccio, Jiri Fronek, Karine Hadaya, Aline Hemke, Christian Jacquelinet, Rachel Johnson, Rafal Kieszek, Dirk Kuypers, Ruthanne LeismanMarie-Alice Macher, David Manlove, Georgia Menoudakou, Mikko Salonen, Bart M.L. Smeulders, Vito Sparacino, F.C.R. Spieksma, Maria de la Oliva Valentín Muñoz, Nic Wilson, Joris van de Klundert

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

8 Citaten (Scopus)
32 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

BACKGROUND: Considerable differences exist among the living donor Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEPs) that are in use and being built in Europe, contributing to a variation in the number of living donor transplants (Newsletter Transplant; International figures on donation and transplantation 2016). Efforts of European KEPs to exchange (best) practices and share approaches to address challenges have, however, been limited. METHODS: Experts from 23 European countries, collaborating on the European Network for Collaboration on Kidney Exchange Programmes Cooperation on Science and Technology Action, developed a questionnaire to collect detailed information on the functioning of all existing KEPs in Europe, as well as their opportunities and challenges. Following a comparative analysis, results were synthesized and interpreted by the same experts. RESULTS: The practices, opportunities and challenges reported by 17 European countries reveal that some of the 10 operating programs are mature, whereas others are in earlier stages of development. Over 1300 transplants were performed through existing KEPs up to the end of 2016, providing approximately 8% of their countries' living kidney donations in 2015. All countries report challenges to either initiating KEPs or increasing volumes. Some challenges are shared, whereas others differ because of differences in context (eg, country size, effectiveness of deceased donor program) and ethical and legal considerations (eg, regarding living donation as such, nonrelated donors, and altruistic donation). Transnational initiatives have started in Central Europe, Scandinavia, and Southern Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange of best practices and shared advancement of national programs to address existing challenges, aided by transnational exchanges, may substantially improve access to the most (cost) effective treatment for the increasing number of patients suffering from kidney disease.

Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)1514-1522
Aantal pagina's9
TijdschriftTransplantation
Volume103
Nummer van het tijdschrift7
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 jul 2019

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Building Kidney Exchange Programmes in Europe: an overview of exchange practice and activities'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

  • Citeer dit

    Biro, P., Haase-Kromwijk, B., Andersson, T., Ásgeirsson, E., Baltesová, T., Boletis, I., Bolotinha, C., Bond, G., Böhmig, G., Burnapp, L., Cechlárová, K., Di Caccio, P., Fronek, J., Hadaya, K., Hemke, A., Jacquelinet, C., Johnson, R., Kieszek, R., Kuypers, D., ... van de Klundert, J. (2019). Building Kidney Exchange Programmes in Europe: an overview of exchange practice and activities. Transplantation, 103(7), 1514-1522. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002432