Borescopic particle image velocimetry in bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds

M. Banaei (Corresponding author), R. Dellaert, N.G. Deen, J.A.M. Kuipers, M. van Sint Annaland

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

Uittreksel

In this work, the borescopic particle image velocimetry (BPIV) technique was applied to a bubbling gas–solid fluidized bed, and the results were compared with published positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) measurement data. Before performing the experiments, the sensitivity of the BPIV results to the illumination power, light reflectivity of the particles, and location of the borescope was also investigated. The BPIV and PEPT results were in fair agreement; however, some discrepancies were observed. The difference between the two sets of results were mainly caused by the intrusiveness of BPIV, the fact that the local solids volume fraction was not accounted for in the BPIV analysis, and the intrinsic differences of these two methods. Therefore, measurement of the local solids volume fraction with the borescope is highly recommended for further development of the BPIV method, which will also enable measurement of the local solids mass fluxes inside dense gas–solid fluidized beds.

TaalEngels
Pagina's66-75
TijdschriftParticuology
Volume43
Vroegere onlinedatum28 jun 2018
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 apr 2019

Vingerafdruk

Velocity measurement
Fluidized beds
Gases
Positrons
Volume fraction
Mass transfer
Lighting
Experiments

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    @article{90e557f53ded429785a688b51be8168e,
    title = "Borescopic particle image velocimetry in bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds",
    abstract = "In this work, the borescopic particle image velocimetry (BPIV) technique was applied to a bubbling gas–solid fluidized bed, and the results were compared with published positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) measurement data. Before performing the experiments, the sensitivity of the BPIV results to the illumination power, light reflectivity of the particles, and location of the borescope was also investigated. The BPIV and PEPT results were in fair agreement; however, some discrepancies were observed. The difference between the two sets of results were mainly caused by the intrusiveness of BPIV, the fact that the local solids volume fraction was not accounted for in the BPIV analysis, and the intrinsic differences of these two methods. Therefore, measurement of the local solids volume fraction with the borescope is highly recommended for further development of the BPIV method, which will also enable measurement of the local solids mass fluxes inside dense gas–solid fluidized beds.",
    keywords = "Borescopic particle image velocimetry, Experimental investigation, Gas–solid bubbling fluidized bed, Hydrodynamics, Solid velocity profile",
    author = "M. Banaei and R. Dellaert and N.G. Deen and J.A.M. Kuipers and {van Sint Annaland}, M.",
    year = "2019",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.partic.2018.01.012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "66--75",
    journal = "Particuology",
    issn = "1674-2001",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Borescopic particle image velocimetry in bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds. / Banaei, M. (Corresponding author); Dellaert, R.; Deen, N.G.; Kuipers, J.A.M.; van Sint Annaland, M.

    In: Particuology, Vol. 43, 01.04.2019, blz. 66-75.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Borescopic particle image velocimetry in bubbling gas–solid fluidized beds

    AU - Banaei,M.

    AU - Dellaert,R.

    AU - Deen,N.G.

    AU - Kuipers,J.A.M.

    AU - van Sint Annaland,M.

    PY - 2019/4/1

    Y1 - 2019/4/1

    N2 - In this work, the borescopic particle image velocimetry (BPIV) technique was applied to a bubbling gas–solid fluidized bed, and the results were compared with published positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) measurement data. Before performing the experiments, the sensitivity of the BPIV results to the illumination power, light reflectivity of the particles, and location of the borescope was also investigated. The BPIV and PEPT results were in fair agreement; however, some discrepancies were observed. The difference between the two sets of results were mainly caused by the intrusiveness of BPIV, the fact that the local solids volume fraction was not accounted for in the BPIV analysis, and the intrinsic differences of these two methods. Therefore, measurement of the local solids volume fraction with the borescope is highly recommended for further development of the BPIV method, which will also enable measurement of the local solids mass fluxes inside dense gas–solid fluidized beds.

    AB - In this work, the borescopic particle image velocimetry (BPIV) technique was applied to a bubbling gas–solid fluidized bed, and the results were compared with published positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) measurement data. Before performing the experiments, the sensitivity of the BPIV results to the illumination power, light reflectivity of the particles, and location of the borescope was also investigated. The BPIV and PEPT results were in fair agreement; however, some discrepancies were observed. The difference between the two sets of results were mainly caused by the intrusiveness of BPIV, the fact that the local solids volume fraction was not accounted for in the BPIV analysis, and the intrinsic differences of these two methods. Therefore, measurement of the local solids volume fraction with the borescope is highly recommended for further development of the BPIV method, which will also enable measurement of the local solids mass fluxes inside dense gas–solid fluidized beds.

    KW - Borescopic particle image velocimetry

    KW - Experimental investigation

    KW - Gas–solid bubbling fluidized bed

    KW - Hydrodynamics

    KW - Solid velocity profile

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049105868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.partic.2018.01.012

    DO - 10.1016/j.partic.2018.01.012

    M3 - Article

    VL - 43

    SP - 66

    EP - 75

    JO - Particuology

    T2 - Particuology

    JF - Particuology

    SN - 1674-2001

    ER -