Adult periodontitis treated with a new device for subgingival lavage-a randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design

L.J. Van Dijk, M.A. Lie, E.R. van den Heuvel, G.A. Van der Weijden

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

Uittreksel

Objectives: To evaluate in patients with untreated adult periodontitis, the effect of treatment with a novel pocket irrigator/evacuator device (IED) compared to conventional subgingival debridement (CPT), both provided during the initial phase of active periodontal therapy. Methods: This study was an examiner-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Systemically healthy patients with adult periodontitis were selected. Full-mouth probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival bleeding on pocket probing scores (BOPP), gingival recession (REC) and dental plaque (PI) were assessed at baseline. All participants received oral hygiene instructions and supragingival prophylaxis including polishing. In 2 randomly assigned contra-lateral quadrants, approximal sites were irrigated with the IED, whereas in the other quadrants, CPT was provided. The CPT consisted of subgingival debridement using ultrasonic devices followed by the use of hand instruments. At 3 months post-treatment, the clinical parameters were re-assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate. At 3 months post-treatment, the PPD and BOPP had significantly improved for both treatment modalities. Pockets of ≥5 mm reduced by 0.64 mm in the IED group (P < .001), compared to a reduction of 0.82 mm for the CPT group (P < .001). With respect to the primary outcome parameter (PPD) and BI, the results with the IED were less pronounced. Between the test and control groups, no significant differences were observed for REC and PI. Conclusions: Oral hygiene instructions, supragingival prophylaxis and subgingival lavage with the IED resulted in a significant reduction in PPD and BOPP. However, the effect does not reach the results of CPT which included the subgingival use of ultrasonic and hand instruments.

TaalEngels
Pagina's559-568
TijdschriftInternational Journal of Dental Hygiene
Volume16
Nummer van het tijdschrift4
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 1 nov 2018

Vingerafdruk

Chronic Periodontitis
Therapeutic Irrigation
Mouth
Randomized Controlled Trials
Equipment and Supplies
Oral Hygiene
Debridement
Ultrasonics
Hand
Gingival Recession
Hemorrhage
Therapeutics
Periodontal Index
Dental Plaque
Control Groups

Trefwoorden

    Citeer dit

    @article{6b5ae605d382480292c22d885c65bcf6,
    title = "Adult periodontitis treated with a new device for subgingival lavage-a randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design",
    abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate in patients with untreated adult periodontitis, the effect of treatment with a novel pocket irrigator/evacuator device (IED) compared to conventional subgingival debridement (CPT), both provided during the initial phase of active periodontal therapy. Methods: This study was an examiner-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Systemically healthy patients with adult periodontitis were selected. Full-mouth probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival bleeding on pocket probing scores (BOPP), gingival recession (REC) and dental plaque (PI) were assessed at baseline. All participants received oral hygiene instructions and supragingival prophylaxis including polishing. In 2 randomly assigned contra-lateral quadrants, approximal sites were irrigated with the IED, whereas in the other quadrants, CPT was provided. The CPT consisted of subgingival debridement using ultrasonic devices followed by the use of hand instruments. At 3 months post-treatment, the clinical parameters were re-assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate. At 3 months post-treatment, the PPD and BOPP had significantly improved for both treatment modalities. Pockets of ≥5 mm reduced by 0.64 mm in the IED group (P < .001), compared to a reduction of 0.82 mm for the CPT group (P < .001). With respect to the primary outcome parameter (PPD) and BI, the results with the IED were less pronounced. Between the test and control groups, no significant differences were observed for REC and PI. Conclusions: Oral hygiene instructions, supragingival prophylaxis and subgingival lavage with the IED resulted in a significant reduction in PPD and BOPP. However, the effect does not reach the results of CPT which included the subgingival use of ultrasonic and hand instruments.",
    keywords = "Bleeding on probing, Irrigator, Lavage, Periodontitis, Plaque, Probing pocket depth, Recession",
    author = "{Van Dijk}, L.J. and M.A. Lie and {van den Heuvel}, E.R. and {Van der Weijden}, G.A.",
    year = "2018",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/idh.12344",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "559--568",
    journal = "International Journal of Dental Hygiene",
    issn = "1601-5029",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "4",

    }

    Adult periodontitis treated with a new device for subgingival lavage-a randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design. / Van Dijk, L.J.; Lie, M.A.; van den Heuvel, E.R.; Van der Weijden, G.A.

    In: International Journal of Dental Hygiene, Vol. 16, Nr. 4, 01.11.2018, blz. 559-568.

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftTijdschriftartikelAcademicpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Adult periodontitis treated with a new device for subgingival lavage-a randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design

    AU - Van Dijk,L.J.

    AU - Lie,M.A.

    AU - van den Heuvel,E.R.

    AU - Van der Weijden,G.A.

    PY - 2018/11/1

    Y1 - 2018/11/1

    N2 - Objectives: To evaluate in patients with untreated adult periodontitis, the effect of treatment with a novel pocket irrigator/evacuator device (IED) compared to conventional subgingival debridement (CPT), both provided during the initial phase of active periodontal therapy. Methods: This study was an examiner-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Systemically healthy patients with adult periodontitis were selected. Full-mouth probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival bleeding on pocket probing scores (BOPP), gingival recession (REC) and dental plaque (PI) were assessed at baseline. All participants received oral hygiene instructions and supragingival prophylaxis including polishing. In 2 randomly assigned contra-lateral quadrants, approximal sites were irrigated with the IED, whereas in the other quadrants, CPT was provided. The CPT consisted of subgingival debridement using ultrasonic devices followed by the use of hand instruments. At 3 months post-treatment, the clinical parameters were re-assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate. At 3 months post-treatment, the PPD and BOPP had significantly improved for both treatment modalities. Pockets of ≥5 mm reduced by 0.64 mm in the IED group (P < .001), compared to a reduction of 0.82 mm for the CPT group (P < .001). With respect to the primary outcome parameter (PPD) and BI, the results with the IED were less pronounced. Between the test and control groups, no significant differences were observed for REC and PI. Conclusions: Oral hygiene instructions, supragingival prophylaxis and subgingival lavage with the IED resulted in a significant reduction in PPD and BOPP. However, the effect does not reach the results of CPT which included the subgingival use of ultrasonic and hand instruments.

    AB - Objectives: To evaluate in patients with untreated adult periodontitis, the effect of treatment with a novel pocket irrigator/evacuator device (IED) compared to conventional subgingival debridement (CPT), both provided during the initial phase of active periodontal therapy. Methods: This study was an examiner-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Systemically healthy patients with adult periodontitis were selected. Full-mouth probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival bleeding on pocket probing scores (BOPP), gingival recession (REC) and dental plaque (PI) were assessed at baseline. All participants received oral hygiene instructions and supragingival prophylaxis including polishing. In 2 randomly assigned contra-lateral quadrants, approximal sites were irrigated with the IED, whereas in the other quadrants, CPT was provided. The CPT consisted of subgingival debridement using ultrasonic devices followed by the use of hand instruments. At 3 months post-treatment, the clinical parameters were re-assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate. At 3 months post-treatment, the PPD and BOPP had significantly improved for both treatment modalities. Pockets of ≥5 mm reduced by 0.64 mm in the IED group (P < .001), compared to a reduction of 0.82 mm for the CPT group (P < .001). With respect to the primary outcome parameter (PPD) and BI, the results with the IED were less pronounced. Between the test and control groups, no significant differences were observed for REC and PI. Conclusions: Oral hygiene instructions, supragingival prophylaxis and subgingival lavage with the IED resulted in a significant reduction in PPD and BOPP. However, the effect does not reach the results of CPT which included the subgingival use of ultrasonic and hand instruments.

    KW - Bleeding on probing

    KW - Irrigator

    KW - Lavage

    KW - Periodontitis

    KW - Plaque

    KW - Probing pocket depth

    KW - Recession

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046158405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/idh.12344

    DO - 10.1111/idh.12344

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 559

    EP - 568

    JO - International Journal of Dental Hygiene

    T2 - International Journal of Dental Hygiene

    JF - International Journal of Dental Hygiene

    SN - 1601-5029

    IS - 4

    ER -