TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of machine learning applications for the proton MR spectroscopy workflow
AU - van de Sande, Dennis M.J.
AU - Merkofer, Julian P.
AU - Amirrajab, Sina
AU - Veta, Mitko
AU - van Sloun, Ruud J.G.
AU - Versluis, Maarten J.
AU - Jansen, Jacobus F.A.
AU - van den Brink, Johan S.
AU - Breeuwer, Marcel
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - This literature review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning (ML) applications in proton MR spectroscopy (MRS). As the use of ML techniques in MRS continues to grow, this review aims to provide the MRS community with a structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, we examine and summarize studies published between 2017 and 2023 from major journals in the MR field. We categorize these studies based on a typical MRS workflow, including data acquisition, processing, analysis, and artificial data generation. Our review reveals that ML in MRS is still in its early stages, with a primary focus on processing and analysis techniques, and less attention given to data acquisition. We also found that many studies use similar model architectures, with little comparison to alternative architectures. Additionally, the generation of artificial data is a crucial topic, with no consistent method for its generation. Furthermore, many studies demonstrate that artificial data suffers from generalization issues when tested on in vivo data. We also conclude that risks related to ML models should be addressed, particularly for clinical applications. Therefore, output uncertainty measures and model biases are critical to investigate. Nonetheless, the rapid development of ML in MRS and the promising results from the reviewed studies justify further research in this field.
AB - This literature review presents a comprehensive overview of machine learning (ML) applications in proton MR spectroscopy (MRS). As the use of ML techniques in MRS continues to grow, this review aims to provide the MRS community with a structured overview of the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, we examine and summarize studies published between 2017 and 2023 from major journals in the MR field. We categorize these studies based on a typical MRS workflow, including data acquisition, processing, analysis, and artificial data generation. Our review reveals that ML in MRS is still in its early stages, with a primary focus on processing and analysis techniques, and less attention given to data acquisition. We also found that many studies use similar model architectures, with little comparison to alternative architectures. Additionally, the generation of artificial data is a crucial topic, with no consistent method for its generation. Furthermore, many studies demonstrate that artificial data suffers from generalization issues when tested on in vivo data. We also conclude that risks related to ML models should be addressed, particularly for clinical applications. Therefore, output uncertainty measures and model biases are critical to investigate. Nonetheless, the rapid development of ML in MRS and the promising results from the reviewed studies justify further research in this field.
KW - deep learning
KW - machine learning
KW - MR spectroscopic imaging
KW - MR spectroscopy
KW - Protons
KW - Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods
KW - Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
KW - Workflow
KW - Machine Learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164332184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mrm.29793
DO - 10.1002/mrm.29793
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37402235
SN - 0740-3194
VL - 90
SP - 1253
EP - 1270
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
IS - 4
ER -