A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all

J.G.M. Mengerink, J.F.H. Noten, R.R.H. Schiffelers, M.G.J. van den Brand, A. Serebrenik

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/CongresprocedureConferentiebijdrageAcademicpeer review

1 Citaat (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a large open-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that the complexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.

Originele taal-2Engels
TitelACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017)
UitgeverijCEUR-WS.org
Pagina's472-474
Aantal pagina's3
StatusGepubliceerd - 2017
EvenementACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017) - Austin, Verenigde Staten van Amerika
Duur: 17 sep 201717 sep 2017
Congresnummer: 20

Publicatie series

NaamCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume2019
ISSN van geprinte versie1613-0073

Congres

CongresACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017)
Verkorte titelModels 2017
LandVerenigde Staten van Amerika
StadAustin
Periode17/09/1717/09/17

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit