A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all

J.G.M. Mengerink, J.F.H. Noten, R. Schiffelers, M.G.J. van den Brand, A. Serebrenik

    Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/CongresprocedureConferentiebijdrageAcademicpeer review

    1 Citaat (Scopus)
    67 Downloads (Pure)

    Samenvatting

    When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a large
    open-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that the
    complexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.
    Originele taal-2Engels
    TitelACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017)
    UitgeverijCEUR-WS.org
    Pagina's472-474
    Aantal pagina's3
    StatusGepubliceerd - 2017
    EvenementACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017) - Austin, Verenigde Staten van Amerika
    Duur: 17 sep 201717 sep 2017
    Congresnummer: 20

    Publicatie series

    NaamCEUR Workshop Proceedings
    Volume2019
    ISSN van geprinte versie1613-0073

    Congres

    CongresACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017)
    Verkorte titelModels 2017
    LandVerenigde Staten van Amerika
    StadAustin
    Periode17/09/1717/09/17

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit