Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking?

D. Beyleveld, M. Düwell, A. Spahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyses the main challenges (particularly those deriving from the non-identity problem and epistemic uncertainty concerning the preferences of future persons) to the idea that we should and can represent future generations in our present policymaking. It argues that these challenges can and should be approached from the perspective of human rights. To this end it introduces and sketches the main features of a human rights framework derived from the moral theory of Alan Gewirth. It indicates how this framework can be grounded philosophically, sketches the main features and open questions of the framework and its grounding, and shows how it can be used to deal with the challenges to the idea that future generations have rights that can be represented in our policymaking.
LanguageEnglish
Pages549-566
JournalJurisprudence
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

human rights
uncertainty
human being
present

Keywords

  • human rights
  • future generations
  • political representation
  • non-identity problem
  • Gewirth

Cite this

Beyleveld, D. ; Düwell, M. ; Spahn, A./ Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking?. In: Jurisprudence. 2015 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 549-566
@article{d0284dd5b038482e926f8a46ba98351c,
title = "Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking?",
abstract = "This paper analyses the main challenges (particularly those deriving from the non-identity problem and epistemic uncertainty concerning the preferences of future persons) to the idea that we should and can represent future generations in our present policymaking. It argues that these challenges can and should be approached from the perspective of human rights. To this end it introduces and sketches the main features of a human rights framework derived from the moral theory of Alan Gewirth. It indicates how this framework can be grounded philosophically, sketches the main features and open questions of the framework and its grounding, and shows how it can be used to deal with the challenges to the idea that future generations have rights that can be represented in our policymaking.",
keywords = "human rights, future generations, political representation, non-identity problem, Gewirth",
author = "D. Beyleveld and M. D{\"u}well and A. Spahn",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/20403313.2015.1065642",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "549--566",
journal = "Jurisprudence",
issn = "2040-3313",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking? / Beyleveld, D.; Düwell, M.; Spahn, A.

In: Jurisprudence, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2015, p. 549-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why and how should we represent future generations in policymaking?

AU - Beyleveld,D.

AU - Düwell,M.

AU - Spahn,A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper analyses the main challenges (particularly those deriving from the non-identity problem and epistemic uncertainty concerning the preferences of future persons) to the idea that we should and can represent future generations in our present policymaking. It argues that these challenges can and should be approached from the perspective of human rights. To this end it introduces and sketches the main features of a human rights framework derived from the moral theory of Alan Gewirth. It indicates how this framework can be grounded philosophically, sketches the main features and open questions of the framework and its grounding, and shows how it can be used to deal with the challenges to the idea that future generations have rights that can be represented in our policymaking.

AB - This paper analyses the main challenges (particularly those deriving from the non-identity problem and epistemic uncertainty concerning the preferences of future persons) to the idea that we should and can represent future generations in our present policymaking. It argues that these challenges can and should be approached from the perspective of human rights. To this end it introduces and sketches the main features of a human rights framework derived from the moral theory of Alan Gewirth. It indicates how this framework can be grounded philosophically, sketches the main features and open questions of the framework and its grounding, and shows how it can be used to deal with the challenges to the idea that future generations have rights that can be represented in our policymaking.

KW - human rights

KW - future generations

KW - political representation

KW - non-identity problem

KW - Gewirth

U2 - 10.1080/20403313.2015.1065642

DO - 10.1080/20403313.2015.1065642

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 549

EP - 566

JO - Jurisprudence

T2 - Jurisprudence

JF - Jurisprudence

SN - 2040-3313

IS - 3

ER -