What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science

C. Bartneck

What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science

C. Bartneck

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The human-computer interaction community is an umbrella for many disciplines. Conflicts occur from time to time, in particular between scientists and designers. This article compares the quality criteria used in design with those used in science, in order to gain insight into what design can contribute to the development of science. From the scientific perspective, the weakest point of design knowledge is its limited generalizability.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2008)
Place of Publication	New York
Publisher	Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.
Pages	2485-2492
ISBN (Print)	978-1-60558-012-X
Publication status	Published - 2008
Event	26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008 - Florence, Italy Duration: 5 Apr 2008 → 10 Apr 2008 Conference number: 26 http://www.chi2008.org/ http://www.chi2010.org/

Conference

Conference	26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008
Abbreviated title	CHI 2008
Country/Territory	Italy
City	Florence
Period	5/04/08 → 10/04/08
Internet address	http://www.chi2008.org/ http://www.chi2010.org/

Cite this

@inproceedings{1005c959ec8941baa1738627afb5e958,

title = "What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science",

abstract = "The human-computer interaction community is an umbrella for many disciplines. Conflicts occur from time to time, in particular between scientists and designers. This article compares the quality criteria used in design with those used in science, in order to gain insight into what design can contribute to the development of science. From the scientific perspective, the weakest point of design knowledge is its limited generalizability.",

author = "C. Bartneck",

year = "2008",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-60558-012-X",

pages = "2485--2492",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2008)",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.",

address = "United States",

note = "26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, CHI 2008 ; Conference date: 05-04-2008 Through 10-04-2008",

url = "http://www.chi2008.org/, http://www.chi2010.org/",

}

What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science. / Bartneck, C.
Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2008). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., 2008. p. 2485-2492.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science

AU - Bartneck, C.

N1 - Conference code: 26

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The human-computer interaction community is an umbrella for many disciplines. Conflicts occur from time to time, in particular between scientists and designers. This article compares the quality criteria used in design with those used in science, in order to gain insight into what design can contribute to the development of science. From the scientific perspective, the weakest point of design knowledge is its limited generalizability.

AB - The human-computer interaction community is an umbrella for many disciplines. Conflicts occur from time to time, in particular between scientists and designers. This article compares the quality criteria used in design with those used in science, in order to gain insight into what design can contribute to the development of science. From the scientific perspective, the weakest point of design knowledge is its limited generalizability.

UR - http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1358628.1358705

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-60558-012-X

SP - 2485

EP - 2492

BT - Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2008)

PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.

CY - New York

T2 - 26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008

Y2 - 5 April 2008 through 10 April 2008

ER -

What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science

Abstract

Conference

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this