What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science

C. Bartneck

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The human-computer interaction community is an umbrella for many disciplines. Conflicts occur from time to time, in particular between scientists and designers. This article compares the quality criteria used in design with those used in science, in order to gain insight into what design can contribute to the development of science. From the scientific perspective, the weakest point of design knowledge is its limited generalizability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2008)
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
    Pages2485-2492
    ISBN (Print)978-1-60558-012-X
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    Event26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008) - Florence, Italy
    Duration: 5 Apr 200810 Apr 2008
    Conference number: 26
    http://www.chi2008.org/

    Conference

    Conference26th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008)
    Abbreviated titleCHI 2008
    CountryItaly
    CityFlorence
    Period5/04/0810/04/08
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What is good? : a comparison between the quality criteria used In design and science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this