TY - JOUR
T1 - Weight recurrence after Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
T2 - a propensity score matched nationwide analysis
AU - Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity (DATO) Research Group
AU - Akpinar, Erman O.
AU - Liem, Ronald S.L.
AU - Nienhuijs, S.W.
AU - Greve, Jan Willem M.
AU - Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J.
AU - de Brauw, L.M.
AU - de Castro, S.M.M.
AU - Damen, S.L.
AU - Demirkiran, A.
AU - Dunkelgrün, M.
AU - Faneyte, I. F.
AU - Greve, J. W.M.
AU - van ’t Hof, G.
AU - Janssen, I. M.C.
AU - Jutte, E. H.
AU - Klaassen, R. A.
AU - Lagae, E. A.G.L.
AU - Langenhoff, B. S.
AU - Liem, R. S.L.
AU - Luijten, A. A.P.M.
AU - Schouten, R.
AU - Smeenk, R. M.
AU - Swank, D. J.
AU - Wiezer, M. J.
AU - Vening, W.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background: Literature remains scarce on patients experiencing weight recurrence after initial adequate weight loss following primary bariatric surgery. Therefore, this study compared the extent of weight recurrence between patients who received a Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) after adequate weight loss at 1-year follow-up. Methods: All patients undergoing primary RYGB or SG between 2015 and 2018 were selected from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. Inclusion criteria were achieving ≥ 20% total weight loss (TWL) at 1-year and having at least one subsequent follow-up visit. The primary outcome was ≥ 10% weight recurrence (WR) at the last recorded follow-up between 2 and 5 years, after ≥ 20% TWL at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included remission of comorbidities at last recorded follow-up. A propensity score matched logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the difference between RYGB and SG. Results: A total of 19.762 patients were included, 14.982 RYGB and 4.780 SG patients. After matching 4.693 patients from each group, patients undergoing SG had a higher likelihood on WR up to 5-year follow-up compared with RYGB [OR 2.07, 95% CI (1.89–2.27), p < 0.01] and less often remission of type 2 diabetes [OR 0.69, 95% CI (0.56–0.86), p < 0.01], hypertension (HTN) [OR 0.75, 95% CI (0.65–0.87), p < 0.01], dyslipidemia [OR 0.44, 95% CI (0.36–0.54), p < 0.01], gastroesophageal reflux [OR 0.25 95% CI (0.18–0.34), p < 0.01], and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) [OR 0.66, 95% CI (0.54–0.8), p < 0.01]. In subgroup analyses, patients who experienced WR after SG but maintained ≥ 20%TWL from starting weight, more often achieved HTN (44.7% vs 29.4%), dyslipidemia (38.3% vs 19.3%), and OSAS (54% vs 20.3%) remission compared with patients not maintaining ≥ 20%TWL. No such differences in comorbidity remission were found within RYGB patients. Conclusion: Patients undergoing SG are more likely to experience weight recurrence, and less likely to achieve comorbidity remission than patients undergoing RYGB.
AB - Background: Literature remains scarce on patients experiencing weight recurrence after initial adequate weight loss following primary bariatric surgery. Therefore, this study compared the extent of weight recurrence between patients who received a Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) after adequate weight loss at 1-year follow-up. Methods: All patients undergoing primary RYGB or SG between 2015 and 2018 were selected from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. Inclusion criteria were achieving ≥ 20% total weight loss (TWL) at 1-year and having at least one subsequent follow-up visit. The primary outcome was ≥ 10% weight recurrence (WR) at the last recorded follow-up between 2 and 5 years, after ≥ 20% TWL at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included remission of comorbidities at last recorded follow-up. A propensity score matched logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the difference between RYGB and SG. Results: A total of 19.762 patients were included, 14.982 RYGB and 4.780 SG patients. After matching 4.693 patients from each group, patients undergoing SG had a higher likelihood on WR up to 5-year follow-up compared with RYGB [OR 2.07, 95% CI (1.89–2.27), p < 0.01] and less often remission of type 2 diabetes [OR 0.69, 95% CI (0.56–0.86), p < 0.01], hypertension (HTN) [OR 0.75, 95% CI (0.65–0.87), p < 0.01], dyslipidemia [OR 0.44, 95% CI (0.36–0.54), p < 0.01], gastroesophageal reflux [OR 0.25 95% CI (0.18–0.34), p < 0.01], and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) [OR 0.66, 95% CI (0.54–0.8), p < 0.01]. In subgroup analyses, patients who experienced WR after SG but maintained ≥ 20%TWL from starting weight, more often achieved HTN (44.7% vs 29.4%), dyslipidemia (38.3% vs 19.3%), and OSAS (54% vs 20.3%) remission compared with patients not maintaining ≥ 20%TWL. No such differences in comorbidity remission were found within RYGB patients. Conclusion: Patients undergoing SG are more likely to experience weight recurrence, and less likely to achieve comorbidity remission than patients undergoing RYGB.
KW - Bariatric surgery
KW - Non-responder
KW - Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
KW - Sleeve gastrectomy
KW - Total weight loss
KW - Weight recurrence
KW - Gastric Bypass
KW - Humans
KW - Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Gastrectomy
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications
KW - Dyslipidemias/etiology
KW - Hypertension/etiology
KW - Obesity, Morbid/surgery
KW - Propensity Score
KW - Weight Loss
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147664556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-022-09785-8
DO - 10.1007/s00464-022-09785-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 36745232
AN - SCOPUS:85147664556
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 37
SP - 4351
EP - 4359
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -