Vulnerability in Social Epistemic Networks

Emily Sullivan, Max Sondag, Ignaz Rutter, Wouter Meulemans, Scott Cunningham, Bettina Speckmann, Mark Alfano (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Social epistemologists should be well-equipped to explain and evaluate the growing vulnerabilities associated with filter bubbles, echo chambers, and group polarization in social media. However, almost all social epistemology has been built for social contexts that involve merely a speaker-hearer dyad. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and group polarization all presuppose much larger and more complex network structures. In this paper, we lay the groundwork for a properly social epistemology that gives the role and structure of networks their due. In particular, we formally define epistemic constructs that quantify the structural epistemic position of each node within an interconnected network. We argue for the epistemic value of a structure that we call the (m,k)-observer. We then present empirical evidence that (m,k)-observers are rare in social media discussions of controversial topics, which suggests that people suffer from serious problems of epistemic vulnerability. We conclude by arguing that social epistemologists and computer scientists should work together to develop minimal interventions that improve the structure of epistemic networks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Philosophical Studies
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • experimental philosophy
  • filter bubble
  • formal epistemology
  • network
  • Social epistemology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Vulnerability in Social Epistemic Networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this