Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
| Publisher | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Publication series
| Name | CWI report. INS-E |
|---|---|
| Volume | 0702 |
| ISSN (Print) | 1386-3681 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Vocabularies for description of accessibility issues in multimodal user interfaces. / Obrenovic, Z.; Troncy, R.; Hardman, H.L.
Amsterdam : Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, 2007. 12 p. (CWI report. INS-E; Vol. 0702).Research output: Book/Report › Report › Academic
TY - BOOK
T1 - Vocabularies for description of accessibility issues in multimodal user interfaces
AU - Obrenovic, Z.
AU - Troncy, R.
AU - Hardman, H.L.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - In previous work, we proposed a unified approach for describing multimodal human-computer interaction and interaction constraints in terms of sensual, motor, perceptual and cognitive functions of users. In this paper, we extend this work by providing formalised vocabularies that express human functionalities and anatomical structures required by specific modalities. The central theme of our approach is to connect these modality representations with descriptions of user, device and environmental constraints that influence the interaction. These descriptions can then be used in a reasoning framework that will exploit formal connections among interaction modalities and constraints. The focus of this paper is on specifying a comprehensive vocabulary of necessary concepts. Within the context of an interaction framework, we describe a number of examples that use this formalised knowledge.
AB - In previous work, we proposed a unified approach for describing multimodal human-computer interaction and interaction constraints in terms of sensual, motor, perceptual and cognitive functions of users. In this paper, we extend this work by providing formalised vocabularies that express human functionalities and anatomical structures required by specific modalities. The central theme of our approach is to connect these modality representations with descriptions of user, device and environmental constraints that influence the interaction. These descriptions can then be used in a reasoning framework that will exploit formal connections among interaction modalities and constraints. The focus of this paper is on specifying a comprehensive vocabulary of necessary concepts. Within the context of an interaction framework, we describe a number of examples that use this formalised knowledge.
M3 - Report
T3 - CWI report. INS-E
BT - Vocabularies for description of accessibility issues in multimodal user interfaces
PB - Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica
CY - Amsterdam
ER -