Uterine monitoring techniques from patients' and users' perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor (p < 0.001). Most important aspects were least likely to harm and least discomfort. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e184-e191
Number of pages8
JournalAJP Reports
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Uterine Monitoring
Catheters
Pressure
Nurses
Patient Preference
Health Personnel
Postpartum Period
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • cardiotocography (MeSH)
  • electrohysterograph
  • external tocodynamometer
  • intrauterine pressure catheter
  • patient preference (MeSH)
  • user preference
  • uterine contraction (MeSH)
  • uterine monitoring (MeSH)

Cite this

@article{bd6e08ab76f2460e9cbc95fb4d092458,
title = "Uterine monitoring techniques from patients' and users' perspectives",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8{\%} preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3{\%} the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9{\%} the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor (p < 0.001). Most important aspects were least likely to harm and least discomfort. Of 57 nurses, 40.4{\%} preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1{\%} the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6{\%} had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results.",
keywords = "cardiotocography (MeSH), electrohysterograph, external tocodynamometer, intrauterine pressure catheter, patient preference (MeSH), user preference, uterine contraction (MeSH), uterine monitoring (MeSH)",
author = "Thijssen, {Kirsten M.J.} and Vlemminx, {Marion W.C.} and Westerhuis, {Michelle E.M.H.} and Dieleman, {Jeanne P.} and {van der Hout-van der Jagt}, {M. Beatrijs} and Oei, {S. Guid}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1669409",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e184--e191",
journal = "AJP Reports",
issn = "2157-6998",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "3",

}

Uterine monitoring techniques from patients' and users' perspectives. / Thijssen, Kirsten M.J.; Vlemminx, Marion W.C.; Westerhuis, Michelle E.M.H.; Dieleman, Jeanne P.; van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs; Oei, S. Guid.

In: AJP Reports, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. e184-e191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uterine monitoring techniques from patients' and users' perspectives

AU - Thijssen, Kirsten M.J.

AU - Vlemminx, Marion W.C.

AU - Westerhuis, Michelle E.M.H.

AU - Dieleman, Jeanne P.

AU - van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. Beatrijs

AU - Oei, S. Guid

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor (p < 0.001). Most important aspects were least likely to harm and least discomfort. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results.

AB - Objective To evaluate preferences from patients and users on 3 uterine monitoring techniques, during labor. Study Design Women in term labor were simultaneously monitored with the intrauterine pressure catheter, the external tocodynamometer, and the electrohysterograph. Postpartum, these women filled out a questionnaire evaluating their preferences and important aspects. Nurses completed a questionnaire evaluating users' preferences. Results Of all 52 participating women, 80.8% preferred the electrohysterograph, 17.3% the intrauterine pressure catheter and 1.9% the external tocodynamometer. For these women, the electrohysterograph scored best regarding application and presence during labor (p < 0.001). Most important aspects were least likely to harm and least discomfort. Of 57 nurses, 40.4% preferred the electrohysterograph, 35.1% the external tocodynamometer, and 24.6% had no preference, or replied that their preference is subject to situation and patient. Conclusion Patients prefer the electrohysterograph over the external tocodynamometer and the intrauterine pressure catheter, while healthcare providers report ambiguous results.

KW - cardiotocography (MeSH)

KW - electrohysterograph

KW - external tocodynamometer

KW - intrauterine pressure catheter

KW - patient preference (MeSH)

KW - user preference

KW - uterine contraction (MeSH)

KW - uterine monitoring (MeSH)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053445001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1669409

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1669409

M3 - Article

C2 - 30250758

AN - SCOPUS:85053445001

VL - 8

SP - e184-e191

JO - AJP Reports

JF - AJP Reports

SN - 2157-6998

IS - 3

ER -