Abstract
We present an exploratory study that compared user feedback obtained from evaluating a mobile application versus a reverse engineered video prototype of this same application. The comparison included qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Questionnaire responses regarding user acceptance (UTAUT [8]) and the overall user experience (AttrakDiff [4]) showed no differences. Qualitative analysis of the comments by potential users yielded similar results. Some differences regarding comments pertaining to the fit of the application to its context of use and appreciation of hedonic qualities, warrant investigation in future research. Usability tests seem better suited to identify issues referring to the functionality and data accessed. Overall the results confirm the validity and usefulness of video prototyping, and can help us develop a better understanding of its strengths and weaknesses.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013 |
Subtitle of host publication | 14th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, September 2-6, 2013, Proceedings, Part II |
Editors | P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, M. Winckler |
Place of Publication | Dordrecht |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 774-781 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-642-40480-1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Event | 14th IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT 2013 - Cape Town, South Africa Duration: 2 Sept 2013 → 6 Sept 2013 Conference number: 14 |
Conference
Conference | 14th IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT 2013 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | INTERACT 2013 |
Country/Territory | South Africa |
City | Cape Town |
Period | 2/09/13 → 6/09/13 |